Night Of the Living Dead, 1990: Bigger, Longer & Uncut

Perhaps the most exciting of all of Umbrella's fuller-than-their-competitors' special editions is their new release of Night Of the Living Dead, 1990. That's the remake of George Romero's original that was produced by Tom Savini. This time, the Australian blu seems to come out ahead in both picture quality and absolutely in the special features department. I mean, this is an early entry in the popular wave of unnecessary remakes, but this disc has made me re-evaluate and decide, you know, maybe there really is a place for NotLD90 in my collection after all.

Update 5/11/16 - 7/12/18: I've added the US DVD for comparison, confirming this definitely is the same root master.

Update 9/29/25: It's on, now!  Sony hasn't just upgraded the movie to 4k.  They haven't just enlisted the perfect man (Red Shirt's Michael Felsher) to create a slew of excellent, new special features.  They've also restored the gore Savini was originally forced to edit out for his R rating, meaning we're getting to see this film uncut for the very first time!  ...They may have also made an unfortunate decision, but we'll get into all that below.
Night '90 plays it very close to Night '68. It's not quite shot-for-shot Psycho, but it really plays it beat-by-beat, with cast members even cast for their resemblance to the original characters. So, what does Night '90 bring to the table? Like, why even watch it if you have the original? Well, updated effects for sure. Expect some new, awesome looking zombies like they never could've created in 1968. And the other thing are Savini's twists. Savini knows most fans are familiar with the original, so he's constantly subverting your expectations and giving you little surprises.

A great example of this is right in the beginning. Again, Night '90 follows Night '68 very closely, right down to the details. Barbara and Johnny are visiting their mother at the graveyard even though Johnny doesn't want to. He teases her, including the famous line, "they're coming to get you, Barbara," while pointing to a stumbling old man walking towards them in the distance. Of course, in '68, this turns out to be the first zombie, Bill Hinzman, who kills Johnny and chases Barbara to the farmhouse. But in the remake, it's just an old man who says "sorry," and walks away before the real zombie pops out of frame left and attacks zombie. Of course, he then kills Johnny by cracking his head against a tomb stone and then chases Barbara just like the original. The film stays on the original's tracks. But it's just got all these little alterations and tweaks to keep fans guessing. And the ending, which I won't spoil, is significantly different.
Seeing this for the first time in widescreen (I used to own the VHS, but Umbrella's 2016 blu was the first time I'd watched it since then), has improved by opinion of this film a little bit. Not that I hated it before, but it struck me as having a made for TV movie look. And it is pretty heavy on close-ups, but the cinematography's a tad more impressive now. Even said close-ups are now less boxy, and it's a fairly well-made production over-all. The soundtrack feels like a quick cable TV project, but it's serviceable. Patricia Tallman and especially Tony Todd are rather good in this film, and even the rest of the cast are a little hokey but express their characters well. And let's face it, the original had a lot of the same problems in that area, so we haven't lost any ground there. The original's stark, grainy black and white look is iconic, and this film can't recapture that; but '90 wisely doesn't try, and instead makes it's own, gentle color look. In a way, it makes the film feel a little delicate and old fashioned, but at least it's distinct rather than a poor man's knock-off.
Splat!
And now in 2025, my opinion has risen another little bit.  Because we're finally able to see it uncut.  And let's face it, more gruesome special effects is the whole selling point of Savini's remake.  So, the new running time is just twelve seconds longer, but there's more to the story than that.  It's not just a story of adding a few bloody frames back in, though there is that.  When Tallman and Todd are fighting the two zombies they find in the house, there's six of those extra seconds, which is essentially a single, nasty shot of Tallman wresting her fire-poker out of the farmer zombie's head, which again, is exactly what we were paying to see in 1990.  But other times footage has been replaced.  So when Tom is shotgunning zombies at the gas pumps, they cut to Tony Todd swinging his torch at zombies back at the porch.  But here, instead of that Todd shot, we get a big, gooey Maniac-style shotgun head explosion.  So, now addition to the run-time, but a big addition to the fun factor.
There's also one change I'm not so fond of.  The first four and a half minutes of this film have been turned black and white, as a tribute to the original.  Then it suddenly switches to color during the first attack.  And it's just cheesy; simply a bad idea in my opinion.  The opening shot of this film is a very low saturation shot of the moon, which I think was already there to suggest the film going from black and white to color, but also nice and subtle, just there for those who want to see it.  Now, eh, it's just revisionist "Greedo shot first" tinkering.  To be fair, Sony has included both this uncut director's cut and the original theatrical version for purists, both scanned in 4k, which is definitely the correct impulse.  But I just wish there was a way to watch the restored, uncut version without the black and white tinkering.  But oh well.  It's a compromise that still definitely beats never getting to see the original, censored footage.
So, like I said, Umbrella's blu was my first time with Night Of the Living Dead 1990 on disc. But it was hardly this film's first time at the rodeo. There was a fullscreen laserdisc, then Columbia Tristar put out a DVD release.  The first edition was a flipper disc, fullscreen on one side and anamorphic widescreen on the other.  It had a Savini commentary and 'making of' featurette, and was later reissued in 2006 as just a single sided widescreen disc, which was essentially duplicated in the UK and other regions. Then Twilight Time put it out on blu for the first time in 2012, with the commentary and ditching the featurette; but most notably it's very dark, with a strong blue hue over the entire picture. Then came Umbrella's blu from Australia in 2016.  I have the solo disc, but they also put out a limited edition 2-disc version which pairs this with the original 1968 Night Of the Living Dead, also on blu. That disc includes a full-length documentary on the original called Reflections On the Living Dead, which was originally released on VHS as The Night of the Living Dead 25th Anniversary Documentary. Anyway, finally, we have Sony's wicked new steelbook UHD/ BD combopack, just in time for Halloween.
1) 2006 US Columbia Tri-Star DVD; 2) 2016 Australian Umbrella BD;
3) 2025 Sony BD; 4) 2025 Sony UHD.


The good news is the blue overcast is thankfully gone from the 2016 release! It's still a detailed, HD transfer. It does have occasional speckling and noise (look closely at the zombies' forehead in that second shot), but it's relatively minimal. It's clearly an older master - as you can see, it's the same one they used on the DVDs - but it's fine even for blu-ray standards, possibly a bit better than Twilight Time's even if you take the dark blue shading out of the equation. Like, if I were giving letter grades, it would be a strong B. Oh, and a lot of sites are listing this as 1.85, but it's actually framed at 1.77:1, which to be fair, is what it says on the back of the case.  The DVD, meanwhile, is slightly window-boxed in the overscan areas to 1.81:1, so you can see Umbrella's blu restores a little bit of vertical information to the picture.

And now Sony frames it at exactly 1.85:1, like it should be.  As you can see, it's a little cooler than the other versions on this page, generally looking the most authentic of all (especially on the UHD, which retains a bit more of the reds than its accompanying BD).  That light film damage on the Umbrella disc has been cleaned up.  And thanks to being a fresh, 4k scan, the transfer finally retains the film grain, which helps this film look more genuinely filmic than previous releases, which help's this film's case for not just being a cheap knock-off.  Hey, look, it's a real movie!
Audio-wise, Sony has the core Dolby 2.0 mix, while Umbrella brings the same as Twilight Time gave us: DTS-HD 5.1.  Sony has it, too, but they've also gone big with a new TrueHD 7.1 mix.  And for purists, the theatrical version (only) also has the 2.0 mix in DTS-HD, as well as the 5.1 and 7.1s.  Only Twilight Time has the isolated musical score track, though, which is pretty much their thing.  Every disc offers optional English subtitles.

As for foreign language options, the DVD also has Chinese, Korean, Portuguese, Spanish and Thai subs, plus a Portuguese dub.  And the 2025 set has German, Italian and Spanish dubs along with Danish, Chinese, Dutch, Finnish, French, German, Italian, Korean, Norwegian, Portuguese, Spanish, Swedish, Thai, and Turkish subs.
But now let's get into extras, because there's some great stuff to dig into. First of all, again yes, Umbrella retains Savini's audio commentary, which except for a couple stretches of silence, is quite good, and addresses a lot of the topics viewers would have about the remake. And they also bring back the 'making of' featurette that Twilight Time dropped, which is also quite good, showing you a lot of the creation of the film. It's like a serious, 25-minute piece, not just one of those typical promo featurettes that plays like a padded version of the trailer.

But then Umbrella kicks in with a bunch of all new extras (which are, interestingly, credited to Severin Pictures). First off is a new on-camera interview with Savini. At first it seems like he's just going to rehash all the things he said in the commentary and featurette, and he does for the first couple minutes. But then he starts getting serious about all the plans he had for this film that the producers made him cut, why that happened and why he thinks they were wrong. He talks about the divorce he was going through during the shoot and his disappointments with the film, whether Romero really ghost-directed the film, and also how he's finally come around to really appreciating it only recently. It goes for almost half an hour and is much more open and honest - thanks I'm sure to the extra passage of time - than the other pieces. Really, if you only check out one extra about this film, this is the one.
Then you've got a fun interview with John Vulich & Everett Burrell, who're on camera together and clearly having a good time. They're very forthcoming, too; and you can imagine the scrutiny you must be under as the effects team when Tom Savini is your director. Patricia Tallman, who was interviewed in the 'making of' featurette, has her own on-camera piece here, too. She's very cheerful and proud of the film, but also addresses things like when Romero took over shooting at the end because Savini had to "go take care of" his divorce. And there's also an eight-minute "behind the scenes" featurette, which is really a collection of video tape footage that the special effects guys took of the shoot. It's tightly edited, so we really just get the interesting moments without like twenty minutes of set-up for an insert shot or actors asleep in their make-up chairs. There's also the original theatrical trailer and reversible cover art, clearly by the same artist as the Night Of the Creeps cover.

And now in 2025?  Sony carries over all of the old stuff from the DVD and yes, from the Umbrella, save one, but let's put a pin that.  Because, besides all that old stuff, we've got a bunch of new stuff, including a new Savini commentary, for the slightly longer director's cut.  And we've got all new, on camera interviews with co-stars Bill Moseley, William Butler, McKee Anderson & Heather Mazur, amiable zombies Greg Funk and Dyrk Ashton, producers John A. Russo & Russell Streiner and editor Tom Dubensky.  Now, Sony does seem to have dropped that eight-minute "behind the scenes" featurette, BUT Felsher has cut that footage into a couple of the interviews, so I'm not sure that every frame is accounted for, but you're really not missing anything.  Sony's disc also comes in a nice looking steelbook case.
I once called Umbrella's blu "the definitive release of Night Of the Living Dead 1990, at least for now." Well, that "now" has turned to "then," because Sony's new release is a strong improvement in every category: picture, audio, special features... and they're put the censored footage back in!  If you care enough to have this film in your collection, this is the one you have to have.

21 comments:

  1. The Umbrella Blu is actually region free -- contrary to its packaging!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, you're right - nice! I corrected the post. =)

      Delete
  2. The Sony blu ray release is a fine edition imho. Actually forced MPAA cuts only amount to about 12 seconds- seen far worse on the Walking Dead series-but hey this was 1990 and anything with Savini or Romero associated with, had the moral police foaming at the mouth. They could have done us a big favour though with censoring Judy Rose's irritating screaming. Annoying to say the least, but still a great film and Tony Todd is superb in it!
    Rick

    ReplyDelete
  3. The Umbrella release has black speckles dancing all over the picture for the first 3 minutes or so and lends itself to accusations of over rightness in some scenes, especially daytime graveyard scene. The Sony release apparently has the color timing more balanced and no speckles. The Umbrella bluray 'defects,' are not distracting and the color timing matches the original release which is a bonus. Also it is in 16.9 whilst the Sony is 1.85 aspect ratio and looks off in some scenes.
    Rob

    ReplyDelete
  4. Typo error. 'right ess' should be 'brightness!'

    ReplyDelete
  5. The Umbrella NOTLD90 is a fine release given the source material. I'd love to see another remake with Walking Dead style special FX, but probably end up too woke!
    Chris B.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you’re afraid of seeing anything “woke”, you might want to avoid literally every movie George Romero ever made.

      Delete
    2. Hardly so, I think you must be joking? How was Dawn of the Dead 1978 'Woke' when Fran was pregnant and smoking cigarettes? 🤔If Woke she wouldnt be doing that and probably would have been in a same sex relationship with 'Flygirl' not 'Flyboy' and casting a black actor Foree in the lead was a nod to 'Night of the Living Dead' plus political motivations at that time, so that could be construed as being anti establishment rather than 'Woke', but the film is hardly politically correct at all. Get real it is a clever social satire on Consumerism!

      Delete
  6. The supposedly 'uncut' version of Night of The Living Dead 1990 is getting a release some time this year according to Tom Savini who is talking about a black and white beginning of the film and then to color. Please no! Uncut yes! but revisionist tinkering, oh no, not again! Only revisionist I want is an uncut version and turn down that awful hysterical screaming of Judy Rose in NOLD 1990😂

    Remember Savini talking about his blessing of that abysmal blue tinted version which was universally panned and despised by all? Remember David Croneberg giving his blessing to the Shivers release remastering which turned out to be the R cut version causing a massive reissue later on. I hope this doesn't turn out to be another dud release causing wasted money and fan gripes again?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh wow. Yeah, I'm excited for an uncut version with more gruesome Savini effects, but I agree about that revisionist black and white stuff. I'll be fine with it if they release both versions, though. Fingers crossed!

      Delete
    2. John, both versions on 4k will be released Sept 23rd this year by Sony: theatrical & unrated with restored MPAA excised scenes. Unrated is advertised as alternate version, which must be the revisionist black and white opening at the start of the film. I would prefer just color! No Blu ray release as far as I know, forcing you to buy 4K!!!

      Delete
  7. Link below.
    https://www.joblo.com/notld-90-uncut/

    ReplyDelete
  8. I think it(D.C) will be released late Summer or in the Fall 2025! Please, please don't let Savini ruin it by letting the cemetery intro run into black and white too long. Prefere no b/w revisionist nonsense at all! You can see the cut scenes in the DVD extras or probably on YouTube these days. Nothing to write home about really! Why they were cut in the first place??? beggars belief!
    Ronny

    ReplyDelete
  9. As I had assumed the b/w nonsense ruins a film. 4.5 mins of it to be precise! Reading the excellent report above makes me think the theatrical isn't half bad considering only 12 seconds difference is what the 'uncensored' version means in essence. The uhd looks too dark in comparison to Blu ray previous versions. I'm more happy to stay with my speckled at the start and over bright in the cemetery Umbrella original R version release. What a let down and overhype of a release and I've not even seen this uhd version yet and probably won't!

    ReplyDelete
  10. I always felt that this film had a made for TV film feel. I didn't like its musical score one iota, but the production value of it was pretty good. If only they had kept that revisionist crap out of it for uhd and got rid of the b/w cheesy homage and most of all censored totally the screaming of that bloody woman Judy Rose character. I will still stick with my R2 DVD which I'd bought for a few quid years ago! I didn't even bother upgrading to Blu ray with this one after many got suckered in with that so called sanctioned by Savini, Twilight blue tone release which wrecked the colour timing and many others' wallets too! By the sound of it, Savini messed this one up too this time by just a little!
    Mike

    ReplyDelete
  11. The screenshots are very accurate. The Sony BD is sharper and much darker than the Umbrella, but minus the speckled dirt at the start of the film. The Sony UHD picture appears darker still, as seems common with many of these so called revisionist 4K's! I'm glad I kept my Umbrella theatrical release which garnered some unfair criticism for being too bright in the 'gloomy' cemetery opening and not 1.85 aspect ratio etc. For me not a problem as the Sony is not without its problems too. The original NOLD90 print is quite similar and speckled dirty as Umbrella took a direct scan from either it's OCN or was it an interpositive? Sony cleaned it up a bit too much some say.

    What I'm not looking forward to is four and half mins of retro black and white nonsense. A minute would have been tribute enough, say driving up road to the cemetary then normal color. I can't see myself taking the plunge again and buying this unless they just put out a Blu Ray. Sony would make some more money if they did and also put out a DVD too, but can't see that happening. Despite all that it is nice to get it uncensored with the cheesy b/w compromise as stated in the excellent preliminary review. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  12. There's quite a few moans about its Atmos track saying height is non existent and folks checking whether they have it turned on properly. Also one gripe about audio cutting out 70 mins into film, but that one might be a dud film pressing causing disc to be faulty. Can't recollect if it was theatrical or d.c version! But overall reviews for this release are quite positive.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Viewed it with a couple of buddies last night on 4K. The black and white is not needed and far too long or too short depending on your perspective what a homage to the original really means? The extra 12 seconds of 'gore' though welcome is blink and you miss apart from the juicy headshot scene which is one weird looking ridiculous zombie head.

    I read somewhere that the original Mpaa cuts actually did the film a favour in terms of making it more realistic. I agree they do. No way would zombified corpses have juicy red blood splashes as in the reinstated skinny Afro Caribbean dude who gets shot in the doorway. I actually think I now prefer the original theatrical and hope it gets released as a standalone by Sony on blu ray as both these 4k uhd DC/theatrical have a great picture. Theatrical is the superior version! Even if the b/w was optional or branched option I still would go for the theatrical cut as its 2.0 audio is great and feels more authenti

    ReplyDelete
  14. Uncensored version only 12 seconds longer! Not the butchered by MPAA to make the R as originally believed. Savini probably meant that his original vision/storyboard never got filmed because of budget or other producer constraints?

    Imagine if they originally planned to make the whole film in black and white, the gore effects would be even more tame. Definitely should have left this 'Directors cut' all in colour. The Theatrical always felt like a TV film, so can't imagine this dc being more impactful with those extra seconds as the film was hardly in the same league as Dawn or Day of The Dead which is still the benchmark for gore sfx. That said, for fans who have never seen this film then a worthy release for sure, but forcing them to buy 4k. That sucks!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Overall the actual gore changes are minimal about 11/12 seconds, but actual scene changes amount to 18 seconds according to below report. You decide which version is better!

    https://www.movie-censorship.com/report.php?ID=325410

    ReplyDelete
  16. Finally got to see this last night! Yes, it's an excellent release and Sony has finally done the film some justice. The black/white opening isn't that bad, but it's not needed at all. I only wish it had been offered as optional instead, if only!!! Yes you can get rid of your old Umbrella or Sony copy with confidence, as this release was worth the wait

    Both the theatrical(88 mins 18 secs)and unrated(88 mins 30 secs) versions have great pictures and audio, but the Atmos is not that great. The extra gore is fleeting and apart from the gunshot head blast, if you watch the theatrical for the the first time you wouldn't really notice the differences. IMDb always had this film down as runtime 92 minutes so that looks like a mistake unless the old Workprint ran at that length of time or Savini had to edit a lot of scenes out prior to release?

    Some non violent scenes might have been trimmed/rearranged by trimming a frame of dialogue or adding something else, but essential the extra gore only amounts to about 10 or so seconds. Considering that we could only see these MPAA 'forced' cuts previously by deleted scenes on a DVD or a shoddy Workprint, the source for this 4K must have been pretty stellar as the quality of the 4K is superb! Now if only someone could manage to locate the deleted scenes of 'Event Horizon' and do the same job on it? Apparently there was a copy of the original 130 minute cut down in a Transylvanian salt mine but was destroyed over time by rot.😉

    ReplyDelete