Frederick Wiseman's Latest, National Gallery, By Way of France

So, Frederick Wiseman's newest documentary, National Gallery, is available now in the US through his film company Zipporah Films on DVD and blu. But given that they use DVD-Rs and BD-Rs, and the high prices they charge for them ($44.95 for their MOD blu!), I thought I might have better luck importing. Well, it's a DVD only title in the UK, but France had an interesting looking version from Blaq Out, so I went with that. A full, properly pressed blu and even with the cost of overseas shipping, it was cheaper to import.
If you're a fan, you certainly know what to expect, but it's fun to see online comments on places like amazon.co.uk from people not expecting a Wiseman film, and hoping apparently, for a video tour of London's National Gallery. "Awful film," says one 1-star review, "[t]oo much talking to the twittering classes and not enough paintings. Seemed to spend forever being a fly on the wall at committee meetings." I don't think we've had a Wiseman film without committee meetings since the 80s, and if anything, I felt this film was a little light on them. That's because this isn't a travelogue to show you the museum's paintings without having to leave your couch; as with most of his films, it's about us, and the way we choose to build our society. Specifically in this instance, it's about the systems we devise to curate and display our artwork.
I know the "Wiseman's films are about systems" is a long-bandied about theory that he's apparently never come out and confirmed - and certainly there's no "correct way to see art, even documentaries - but the more I see of these films, the more clear it seems to me that this is what he's really attempting to show us. And it's fascinating. I mean, if you want to see some important paintings, you do; and you get to hear some intelligent opinions about art as we eavesdrop on guided tours and television interviews filmed in the museum. But so much more interesting is the look at what we've made: how the museum is run and why, from the budgeting to the restoration. Who decides what art we get to see and what the line is between restoration and embellishment? Who visits the museum and who doesn't? We see the tearing down and building of walls as exhibitions are designed, events are held while other offers are argued against, people give a wide array of opinions on the meaning and value of art, and the proper way to maintain it. It even winds up operating on a probably unintended "meta" level, where the questions people ask about what art should and shouldn't be shown and why also apply to the footage Wiseman is shooting and will ultimately cut together or leave out.
On the other hand, the fact that this film has almost half as many 1-star reviews as 5-stars (and practically none in between) illustrate how this documentary isn't for everyone. His work seems to split into one of two categories: undeniable powerhouse documentaries that would move anyone, like Titicut Follies, Domestic Violence and Near Death, and drier studies that you probably need to me in the right frame of mind to appreciate, like Boxing Gym or Belfast, Maine. I was totally absorbed by Belfast, Maine, but I could see how other film-goers would want to go outside and bury themselves by the 4 hour mark, pining for the artificial narratives of placating documentaries like Murderball or Spellbound (MORE SHOTS FIRED!!). And speaking of running times, since Wiseman's films run the long gamut of 84 to 358 minutes long; it's worth pointing out that National Gallery comes in at a long but not unmanageable 3 hours and 1 minute.
So let's talk about this French blu. First of all, yes, it's a proper blu-ray disc. Dual-layer even. It's 1080p and looks great, as you can see in these screenshots. For what "virtual tour" elements there are in this movie, getting to see the paintings photographed in HD is a nice boon. You also get the option of DTS-HD 2.0 and DTS-HD 5.1 mixes. It doesn't have any extras, but it almost did. You'll find multiple online listings noting four interviews: with an art historian, a picture restorer, Nicholas Penny, director of the National Gallery, and one with documentary filmmaker Patricio Guzman Lozanes on Wiseman's approach. I contacted Blaq Out directly about this and they were good enough to write back, "Je vous confirmer qu'il n'y a aucun supplément sur le blu-ray et le DVD du film. A la demande de Frederick Wiseman qui n'aime pas ça," which google translates to, "I confirm that there is no supplement on the blu-ray and DVD movie. At the request of Frederick Wiseman who do not like it."

Argh! How frustrating when out of touch filmmakers make up these policies about their films on home video because they don't watch or "get" DVDs. It's like when David Lynch decreed that their should be no chapter stops on DVDs. Meanwhile, Wiseman has a whole book for sale talking about the making of his films, so apparently that's okay? Blah. Oh well. Those features would've been a nice bonus, but the important thing is still a top quality release of the film itself, and that's what we've got here. Plus, it comes in a cool black case with better cover art than the UK disc, and it's sheathed in a nice slip cover.
Except for one more possibly frustrating aspect about this particular release. It has somewhat forced French subtitles, probably to discourage exactly the kind of importing I've done and am recommending. Now, they're not burnt into the image, but they're set so hitting the subtitle button won't switch them off. I found I could get them off with some trickery on one player, but not at all on another, and turning the subtitle option off worked perfectly on my PC (and I'm talking direct playback from the disc, no ripping files or anything complicated like that). So "ymmv," as they say. But I actually just left them on the first time I viewed the film because they're small and very unobtrusive (though still distinct and legible, unlike White Ribbon's US blu), so they didn't bother me either way. But you should know, depending on your player, they may give you a little annoyance.
So I do recommend this.Even with the subtitle issue and the torpedoed special features, this seems to be the best release of the film available. And while I'm on board for any and all of Wiseman's films, I liked this one more than some of his other recent work like Crazy Horse. And you might also be interested to know that just this month, Blaq Out has put out a big boxed set of Wiseman's first 13 films on DVD. Again, they're pressed discs rather than DV-Rs, and a lot cheaper to import that than to collect all 13 discs here in the US. And they've already announced to release the rest in 2016. So France's Blaq Out are turning out to be the go-to guys for Wiseman's work, and I figure that's probably who I'll be copping In Jackson Heights from, too.

A Christmas Horror Story

I was going to let A Midwinter's Tale stand as my Holiday post for the season, but what the hay, here's one more. Merry Christmas, everybody! Today I'm looking a new release: the succinctly titled A Christmas Horror Story. You know, I don't find a lot of horror movies I really like being produced these days. I'm discovering more 70s and 80s horror movies I dig - and that's the era I grew up in! - than new ones. I mean, sure, there are plenty I find to be okay and worth the watch. But one where I'm really excited by it and feel like I have to get the blu-ray in my collection immediately? Very rare. But I finally hit on one with A Christmas Horror Story.

Update 2/21/20: Nothing major; just added the DVD edition for a comparison.
A Christmas Horror Story is similar in style to Trick 'R Treat, the 2007 Halloween-themed horror anthology where the stories are linked and taking place more or less concurrently. But make no mistake, Krampus is the Krampus-featuring 2015 horror film made by the same guy as Trick 'R Treat (not even counting the two low budget knock-offs that went straight to DVD this year). This is actually made by a trio of other directors who came together and managed to make one of the most polished, clever and impressive horror films of the decade.

There aren't really any big names in this except for William Shatner, who essentially acts as the host of the "wrap around," or as close as this film gets to having one. And he's actually quite good in this. I was expecting a Campfest '89, but actually the performances in this film are consistently one of the strongest elements this film has going for it. Although, honestly, you could add stylish cinematography, convincing special effects (only one shot struck me as disappointing CGI) and smart writing to that list as well. It's an anthology, so of course one story's going to stand out as less compelling than the rest. In this case it's about a group of teenagers who sneak into their high school basement over Christmas break because a murder happened there last year. But even that one is so well made that it never feels like it's letting the rest of the team down.
But the other stories are more exciting. You've got the Krampus one, and it's a great monster with a simple yet effective story, like a Yuletide Pumpkinhead. No wonder three other movie studios rushed out Krampus movies this year. Then there's a story about a broken family that steals a Christmas tree from private property and gets a difficult comeuppance that feels like it should be the most boring of the lot. But everyone does such an excellent job on it, it turns out to possibly be the best of them all. And most audaciously, the last story is a zombie virus breakout that happens at Santa's workshop in the North Pole. If you're thinking to yourself, there's no way that awesome scene on the box actually actually happens in the movie, you're wrong, it does! On paper, it should be a disaster, on par with something from Scy-Fy or Asylum studios at best (Troma at worst), but amazingly it all works, leading up to a terrific twist ending I never saw coming!
2015 RLJ DVD top; 2015 RLJ BD bottom.
So this is a brand new release of a brand new film that was shot in 2k and delivered digitally, so there's no reason this shouldn't look great on blu, and it does. It's slightly letterboxed to 1.85:1 and looks beautiful in 1080p. The DVD is naturally the same transfer, just more compressed, but you really see the difference toggling between screenshots.  Besides the softness you'd expect to find, it's like all the little highlights blink out every time you click on the SD version.  And apparently this was a DVD-only release in the UK and other parts of the world, so you might want to think about importing from the US if you're overseas, and if you're local, enjoy getting this cheap and easy at your local big box store.

And speaking of getting this at big box stores, be warned if you're thinking of buying this at Walmart, as the slipcover has its title changed to A Holiday Horror Story (the DVD cover underneath retains the original Christmas title). That's either something to steer far clear of or an amusing collector's item depending on your state of mind. And the slip is a really great looking embossed image - I've scanned it, but that doesn't fully do it justice.

Regardless, the audio's a bold 5.1 mix, in DTS-HD on the blu; and both editions include optional English subtitles.
I was a little disappointed this wasn't a more packed special edition, but the one extra it does have turned out to be surprisingly good. It's a 15 minute featurette, but it's not the standard clip-heavy narration fare that plays like an extended trailer. It's a great little mini-doc that tells the story of the film's inception and production, interviewing all three directors, a lot of the cast on-set (though not Shatner), and includes some nifty behind-the-scenes shots. So maybe it would've just been bloated with a commentary and other features. What we've got was at least fully engaging, if brief. Still, you'd think they could've at least thrown in the trailer. Instead there's just a couple bonus trailers that play on start-up.
I wasn't expecting much from this film, especially after being disappointed by more promising 2015 horror films like Cooties, Deathgasm and We Are Still Here (SHOTS FIRED!!). I started out just casually streaming it, but was so impressed I stopped watching it and ran out to buy the blu the next day. That's pretty rare for me, and especially with modern horror. And now it's already held up to repeated watches, so I give this a great big recommendation, even if you've read the description and felt a little wary. That's how I felt, too; and look how much I'm gushing now. Give it a shot.

The People Who Own the Dark, Code Red's Second Stab At It

Code Red's been steadily upgrading their DVD catalog to blu-ray for a while now, but The People Who Own the Dark is one I've particularly been waiting for. Why? Because the DVD was essentially the best they could do with poor source elements, made up of a pair of compromises. We had "a brand new telecine from an abused, scratched and beat-up 35mm print that went vinegar" and an "old transfer from 1 inch Sun Video tape found in Jim Markovic's shack" both on the same disc. The 35mm print version is so "beat up," in fact, it's flat-out missing a bunch of shots. So, in short, the print version looked better (though it had scratches and issues the tape version didn't), but the tape version's complete. But then when I read that the upcoming blu-ray featured a "brand new HD telecine from New discovered 35mm print," I was excited. Finally, maybe we had the best of both worlds, and an HD upgrade to boot?
People is kind of a crazy Spanish film by Leon Klimovsky, that you could pitch as 'Night Of the Living Dead but with blind people as the zombies' (decades before 2008's Blindness), but there's even more weirdness to it than that. The protagonists (certainly not heroes) of our film are a group of the ruling elite class, and their courtesans, who have gathered together at an isolated villa for a retreat dedicated to living the teachings of the Marquis de Sade. They're just starting to get fully debauched in their stone dungeon party basement when there's an Earthquake. Going upstairs, it turns nuclear war broke out, and the radioactive blasts has turned everybody blind, except our party goers, who were safe underground. Negotiations with the locals immediately go South, with people dead on both sides, and so they retreat back to their villa and proceed to go crazy.  Really crazy - one guy spends the rest of the movie crawling around naked on all fours, believing he's a dog with a tape recorder around his neck.
Eventually, things start to feel like a more traditional horror film when the blind lay siege to the villa. It makes good use of the Blind Dead gag where they're walking very closely to the blind people and have to stay completely silent not to be caught. And other times it's classic "board up the doors" NotLD-style. The dubbing is going to keep mainstream viewers away from this no matter how much of a cult audience it accrues, but if you're looking for an entertaining and engaging flick that's pretty unique - campy but bleak, playing it completely straight with some genuinely effective atmosphere - this will do ya. In fact, I've turned out to really like this one, in a demented guilty pleasure sort of way. Most people will never get the appeal, I'm sure; but for cult fans, it's a great one to keep revisiting.
a shot missing from the DVD transfer taken from a 35mm print
So what's the old 35mm print version missing? Well, nothing major. There are multiple instances where damage has just killed a few frames, so the film skips, particularly around reel changes. But the points where you actually lose multiple shots, lines of dialogue, etc, are almost all grouped near the beginning. In fact, it starts right in the opening credits, most of which are missing from the old 35mm DVD. That continues into the opening shots of the film, with the first couple in bed and some lines by the guy. Then the print cuts right to a red car pulling up to Spanish horror icon Paul Naschy. But on the tape version, we see him skeet shooting live birds first. So, really, the first couple minutes are really messed up on the print version. Then there are two more moments. At 11:13, it's missing the part where the ladies leave their car and walk into the shop, including some dialogue where the new girl admits she's nervous. And at about 13:30, we lost some shots of the doctor walking into the party and getting greeted. The only drop not near the beginning is right at the very ending, which is pretty spoilerific, so I'll just say a couple shots and several lines of dialogue are missing around the 1:14:15 mark.

Now, are those missing bits restored on the transfer from the new 35mm print? Yes! it's all there. The new version has the completeness of the 1" tape, and the superior look of the print. It's also far less scratched and dirty (though it still has a bit) than the old one. In fact, let's have a proper comparison of all three.
The 2012 DVD's 1" tape transfer on top, the DVD's 35mm transfer mid,
and the new 2015 blu-ray transfer bottom.
So, they look fairly different. The framing is a bit different. The tape transfer is about 1.51:1, while the other two are regular 16x9 1.78:1. But even those two vary distinctly, as the new transfer is zoomed further out, with more picture information on all four sides.

But more than the framing, the new print has quite visibly different color timing and is decidedly brighter than the old one. Sometimes too bright, but overall, it does bring out more detail in the HD, whereas it sometimes got hard to see what was going on in the dark scenes on the DVD print, even crushing the blacks. The first shot shows one of the most extreme examples of what I'd call too bright or over-exposed, but the second set of shots shows how that helps in the dark scenes. The perfect transfer would probably be a bit in between, but overall I'd say the new transfer is preferable in this aspect, too. The tape transfer is, of course, the darkest and murkiest of all. Plus it's interlaced and non-anamorphic (in the second set of shots, I left it the black around it so you can see how it would look on a widescreen TV). It's not quite unwatchable, and the taller aspect ratio gives you a bit of an open matte feel with more picture on the top and bottom; but really, the only reason you'd have chosen it is to see those missing moments from the old print.
The 2012 DVD's 1" tape transfer on top, the DVD's 35mm transfer mid,
and the new 2015 blu-ray transfer bottom.
Here we see just how bad the print damage got on the old DVD. Granted, I picked a pretty extreme example for the first set - this was right around the edges of some dropped footage, and the film only looks that bad for a handful of seconds at most. But those ARE legit screengrabs from the movie; it really does look like that. The second set is a more typical example, with just some green specs, but those are also cleaned up on the new transfer. Plus all the detail restored to the shadows. The colors are a bit off on the new transfer all throughout, but this last set is an extreme example - surely her bed isn't actually green. Looking at other screenshots throughout this post (all the non-comparison shots are from the blu), they don't look terribly off. And even if they were, for all the benefits, I'd take it anyway. Oh, and just look at that interlacing on the tape transfer - yuck! Yeah, I'm only too happy to discard the DVD transfers for this new blu, colorization qualms or no.

The mono audio tracks on both the DVD print version and blu-ray sound pretty good, with a little more crackle, naturally, on the beat-up DVD version. The tape master's audio is a little more muffled and hissy; but all are fine.
There's really no extras to get excited over on either release, but I guess that's to be expected from an underground Spanish horror flick from 1976. The original DVD opened with the classic Code Red Family Honor trailer, with a couple other bonus trailers accessible from the menu. The only extra it had actually pertaining to People - though it sorta felt like it had more with its two transfers of the film - is the original theatrical trailer. Happily, that has made its way onto the blu, too. But that's all there is.
So that's what this blu-ray is: not a fancy special edition, just a solid presentation of a cool, little cult film. If you've got the DVD, you'll definitely want to upgrade, as this is more than just the standard def transfer bumped up to HD, it's an all new, fixed version that would be worth upgrading to even if it was a second DVD. But of course it's even sweeter for being HD, too.

Before Todd Haynes' Carol, See Dottie Gets Spanked

So, while you guys are all enjoying Carol and giving it awards and everything, I'm sitting here a little apprehensive. I haven't seen it yet, and I will, so I'm not genuinely criticizing it, but I can't help feeling like it's going to be Far From Heaven 2.0, with Cate Blanchette instead of Julianne Moore and a secret lesbian affair that 50s society can't handle instead of a secret interracial affair that 50s society can't handle. Plus, with these films and Mildred Pierce, is Todd Haynes just returning to the Douglas Sirk well over and over? Don't get me wrong, I'll eventually see it and I'm sure it will actually be great and I'll think how silly I was for putting it off. But for now I'm looking back to an underrated early masterpiece of Haynes': Dottie Gets Spanked.
I'm aware I was just bemoaning Haynes stagnating in a highly produced 1950s safe zone, only to celebrate another of his films set in the 50s. But I'm not saying he can't make great movies set in the 1950s, just the opposite. It's clearly a look he's mastered. And in this instance, it feels less like a romanticized quasi-fantasy world and more like an authentic confessional set in this period. I mean, "confessional" might be a bit heavy-handed or overly loaded, but Haynes himself says this is the film that draws the most from autobiographical material of any film he's done. In other words, it feels more real rather than like it's escaping from reality to tell more of a parable. Plus, technically, I think this might actually be meant to be the early 60s.
It's a simple story, as its a short film originally produced for public television, but it's very rich. Steven is a six year-old boy obsessed with Dottie of the Dottie Frank Show, a fictitious stand-in for I Love Lucy or the Here's Lucy show. Steven becomes fixated on the image of Dottie getting spanked on her show (just like Lucille Ball did on her show), and wins a contest so he go visit the taping of the actual show. It gets pretty inventive, taking us into his dreamworld; but it's the simplest, down-to-earth moments that are the most relatable, and therefore the most effective.
Dottie is from 1994, which means it isn't an early short that pre-dates all of his features. He'd already releases Poison by this point, and it's clear from the production values this is far beyond a student film. Again produced by Christine Vachon, Dottie features several recognizable character actors, and Adam Arkin even turns up in a small part. This is a professional and fully effective film. I saw The Suicide, Haynes' first short film that was recently included on Criterion's blu-ray of Safe as an extra; and that was more of a curiosity piece, mostly just fun to see what a famous, accomplished filmmaker made as a young man. This isn't that. This is a film absolutely worth seeking out on its own merits.
Also on this disc, since you kind of want to flesh out a DVD made for a short film, is He Was Once. This is a 1989 short by a filmmaker named Mary Hestand, but it's co-produced by Haynes and Vachon, and Todd even has a secondary role in the film. This is a fun subversion of the old claymation show Davey & Goliath, where live actors mimic the look and style of the stop motion characters and subvert the bland, wholesome messages of the original show. It's not something you'd pick up watching the film on its own, but together, its really interesting to connect how both films center around almost identical spanking imagery, plus have dark, black and white, surrealistic dream sequences. But I can't help thinking I'd have gotten a bigger kick out of this if I'd grown up with Davey & Goliath, leaving me with that feeling of trying to appreciate a parody of something I've never seen.
Dottie Gets Spanked on top; He Was Once below.
Zeitgeist's 2004 TV looks alright if you go in with low expectations for a low budget television production. But Dottie was originally shot on 16mm (I'm not sure about He Was Once), so it would be great to see Criterion or another label produce a new, HD transfer. Sure 16mm wouldn't reveal a whole ton more detail, but it could look a lot more natural and attractive, I'm sure, then this transfer which appears to be taken from a videotape source. The DVD is also interlaced, so fixing that alone would be a nice boost.

For an indie company like Zeitgeist and a pair of short, obscure films, it's nice to see they included optional English subtitles as well.
A big plus of Zeitgeist's DVD is the audio commentary by Todd Haynes. It's only for Dottie (another for He Was Once would've been terrific, too), but it's excellent. Haynes is prepared with notes, including the original proposal he wrote to ITVS, and he has a lot of specific memories, both of producing the film and the original events that inspired it. He goes it alone, but he never runs out of steam or feels wanting of a moderator. Also included is a photo gallery and a fold-out insert with credits and notes by Bill Horrigan.
So if you're on your way to or from seeing Carol in theaters, I highly recommend tracking this one down, too. Dottie's a great film, and He Was Once is at least an entertaining brief watch, too. Haynes fans will absolutely appreciate his commentary, too. I know a couple foreign DVDs of Poison included Dottie as an extra, but this disc is still worth getting for the whole package. And I wouldn't hold your breath on my blu-ray restoration coming through... although if anybody from the studio is reading this, it would fit in pretty well as an special edition extra feature on Carol next year, wouldn't it?

Blood Rage At Shadow Woods, Arrow's Awesome New Release

Oh boy, I've been waiting for this one! That's partially because this is a formative horror movie I first taped off of cable as a kid and watched many times since, and I've been waiting for a high quality, special edition of it. And it's also because this has had it's release date pushed back about half a dozen times. But since they turned this into an incredibly impressive 2-disc blu-ray set (technically 3-disc set, but disc 3 is just a DVD copy of disc 1), with multiple cuts including an all new composite cut of the film, plus heaps of extras, I'd say every delay was worthwhile.
Blood Rage a.k.a. Nightmare At Shadow Woods is a cheesy but quite entertaining little slasher film from the 80s. Woody Allen's first muse, Louise Lasser, stars as the mother of two twin boys, one of whom commits a gruesome murder at a drive-in during the 1970s. The bad one blames it on the good one, and we return to our characters ten years later, on Thanksgiving no less, when the good brother escapes from his mental institution and returns home. The bad brother sees this as a great opportunity to go on a homicidal rampage, as he can blame all the killings on his brother again. And so ultimately everyone's running around this apartment complex late at night, looking for or hiding from each other.
Lasser is delightfully delirious as the mother who immediately spins completely out of control when she receives word of her son's escape, and the relatively unknown Mark Soper is surprisingly effective playing both brothers. And everyone else delivers at least competent, slasher movie-level performances. In its uncut form (which yes, is on this release), the film is surprisingly gory, with some great special effects; and it's all set to this really catchy synth soundtrack. And while this movie always had the feel of a shot-on-video cheapie back in the day, seeing it restored to its original widescreen presentation, you can appreciate that it's actually rather well-lit and professional. When I first heard news that Arrow was resurrecting this film, I was excited, but I sort of felt like I might be the only person on Earth who'd be into it. But watching the restored version, I think this film is ready to be discovered by a new audience.
Up 'till now, this film has only been available on a low budget (and not strictly legally licensed) DVD from Legacy.  But if you've got one, you can chuck it in the bin, because Arrow has just released the ultimate, definitive edition. on blu-ray and DVD. They've got the uncut Blood Rage version (with the on-screen title Slasher). They've got the censored Nightmare At Shadow Woods version, which is still worth having because it features a bunch of scenes and alterations not in the Blood Rage cut. And they've made a terrific new composite cut which brings in all the footage of both versions! In fact, let's not just glide over this, let me get into exactly what's different about each version.
Blood Rage is best known for having all the complete gore scenes. When Terry kills Lasser's boyfriend, there's a particularly gruesome shot where his head is split wide open. That's only in Blood Rage. But that's not the only difference. You know the big scene near the beginning with the goofy narration where Lasser goes to visit Todd at the institution? That's only in Blood Rage. Nightmare makes the perhaps wise decision to cut out that whole silly bit, as its the only point in the only film where there's any narration, since it's very heavy-handed and amateurish (albeit also effectively comic).
On the other hand, Nightmare does more than just cut the gore and narrated scene. For one thing, it has a whole segment where most of the film's characters meet and hang out at the swimming pool. It's not just a quick scene, it's three whole minutes with characters coming and going. And Nightmare has some extra nudity. Yeah, they trimmed it for blood, but whoever was making the edit was more than fine with the sex. In Blood Rage, there's a scene where two of the kids play a prank on two of the others by putting bloody make-up on and pretending to be dead. That's cut from Nightmare. So it cuts right from the kids in the den to one of the couples having sex on the diving board. And there's a whole, long tracking shot of their naked bodies seen on in Nightmare. This makes for a weird bit of continuity, since you have to believe the couple left the den to have sex on the diving board, then went to play tennis, and then went back to have sex on the diving board a second time. Also, since those kids never put on the make-up, they don't need the shower scene of the girl washing it off. But since Nightmare's not going to waste any nudity, they move that scene to after the pool stuff, like she's showering after having been in the pool, which kinda works.

The composite cut, of course, includes everything, from the head split to the institution to the pool scene. But they made the decision to not break the continuity of having the diving board sex scene happen two times in the film. So consequently, that one bit is only in the Nightmare At Shadow Woods cut and not in the composite. I believe the film plays better that way, but you know, if you're the "Mr. Skin" type, you should know that the Shadow Woods print does contain an extra little piece of nudity for you.
Arrow's 2015 blu-ray on top; Arrow's 2015 DVD below.
Arrow has made Blood Rage look amazing. Like, I cannot believe someone put in the expense and care to make this film look this good. It's an all new 2k scan of the original camera negative, and it's beautiful. The framing's left open to 1.78:1 16x9.  It's clear just from looking at it, though, that they only had a 35mm print for Nightmare At Shadow Woods. Look at the swimming pool shot I posted earlier; it's more contrasty, with maybe slightly crushed blacks and some damage... But most of Nightmare and the composite cut look just as good as Blood Rage because they use the negative footage everywhere they can, which is like 90+% of the film. It only switches to the slightly less impressive print footage when it's all they have. And honestly, even that's fine. You can easily spot the difference, but it's not distractingly inferior.

I'm not even bothering to take screengrabs of each cut of the film, because again, they're using the exact same transfer of the footage each time, except for the exclusive shots, which of course don't have matches. And I've included such a shot and we've look at that anyway. But I did throw in a match of the DVD version, for anyone concerned about that. Naturally it's just a more compressed, standard definition version of the same transfer. It holds up pretty well for a DVD.

The audio has been taken from the original elements, too, and turned into a nice English LPCM 2.0 stereo track. But there is a healthy taste of old school background hiss throughout the whole thing. Arrow has also included optional English HOH subtitles.
And extras, oh yes, Arrow delivers once again! The director (and one of the film's new owners) provide an audio commentary, which uh, I'll come back to. They managed to get Louise Lasser for an on-camera interview. And I was worried at first that she was just going to talk about her more mainstream career and be like "I don't really remember" when it came to Blood Rage, but no, she remembered it quite well and had a lot of interesting things to say about it. Special effects artist Ed French has an in-depth interview, Mark Soper has an enthusiastic one, producer Marianne Kanter has a funny one... even Ted Raimi has one for his brief, silent cameo in the film's opening credits. What else? Let's see, there's a featurette visiting all of the film's old Florida locations. There's like a half hour's worth of outtakes, though they don't have audio, so you might just want to casually fast forward through those... Still, it's cool that they're here. There's also a run of the opening credits taken from the VHS tape (though they actually aren't any different except for the title card) and a photo gallery. There's also a nice booklet with notes by Joseph A. Ziemba, and the packaging includes reversible artwork and a cool, slightly embossed slip cover. It's a terrific package.
So okay, about that commentary. I've read a couple of reviews saying it's quite good, which makes me wonder if they actually listened to it before writing the review or if they just "needle dropped" it. I won't point to any specific links, but this commentary is a bit of a train wreck. The entire time, I couldn't decide if the director was being deliberately antagonistic - like maybe he was contractually obligated to be there and was doing it under protest or something. Because he volunteers nothing. The moderator asks him if he remembers working with Lasser and he says "yes." And that's it. Most of the commentary is complete silence. And the moderator deserves some blame for that, too, because he never follows up or presses him. He just accepts single word non-answers and then lapses into long periods of complete silence himself.

And when the director does talk, it's clearly been edited in. Like he did a separate interview, and the Arrow people dropped in clips from that whenever they were silent for too long. The producer wasn't there for the filming, so he has very little to add, though there is an interesting portion where he talks about how they had to sue the people releasing Blood Rage illegally on DVD before Arrow came along. Overall, it's worth listening to for that and the little snatches of talking... the additional interview talk is probably about 10-15 minutes worth, and the director does manage to say a few short things with the moderator prompting him. Ultimately, I'm glad the commentary is included; it's better to have it than not. But come, on fellow reviewers, it's not good at all, it's a huge mess Arrow had to really struggle to salvage. And even after all of that, it's an awful lot of awkward, dead air that's uncomfortable to sit through.
But don't let my criticisms fool you, I am in love with this release. Arrow has gone above and beyond expectations, giving a very minor film absolutely top tier treatment. I think the new composite cut they created is the best way to watch this film, it's the new definitive cut in my book. Some of the extras are great, and I even enjoyed the troubled ones. And the visual and audio presentation has even upped my appreciate for this film, which was already probably higher than almost anybody else's. Collector's will love Arrow's consistently strong packaging... I believe this version is a limited edition, and it will later be released without the second disc and alternate versions of the film. Most of the extras are on disc 1, so casual viewers will get that and the Blood Rage edit. But if you're going to get this film, I sincerely suggest getting this set now for the composite cut. I mean, the film ain't exactly Shakespeare, so "not for everybody" strongly applies here; but if you dig this kind of movie, then this release gets my highest recommendation.