Arrow Delivers the Definitive Lords Of Chaos

Oh yeah, I've been waiting for this one to arrive!  I almost broke down and copped the US edition that came out earlier this year, but that and the German blu are barebones.  Only Arrow has created a proper special edition, just released this summer, of Jonas Akerlund's Black Metal true crime dramatization Lords Of Chaos.  And yes it's one of their UK only titles (since MVD have licensed it for the US) and it's labeled Region B, but the disc doesn't seem to actually be region locked at all.  ...By the way, this post has inspired me to add a new True Crime category to the site index.

Update 8/14/19 - 12/15/22: I went back and got my hands on the US Fox DVD of this film.  If that feels a little underwhelming, I've also updated my Stalker and Satyricon pages with their respective Criterion DVDs.  I don't suppose three minor updates add up to one substantial one?
Lords Of Chaos is great, but before I get into it, hopefully I can just quickly try to head off anymore people being mislead.  I'm seeing this film get categorized fairly regularly as a horror film... The opening line of its wikipedia entry is, "Lords of Chaos is a 2018 horror-thriller film," Amazon lists it as "Horror, Suspense," etc etc.  There are a couple of gruesome moments, but I think the marketing is leading people to expect a film like some kind of cross between Jackals and Deathgasm, which this definitely is not.  It's decidedly better than either of those flicks, but it didn't even particularly strike me as being horror adjacent.  It's much more in line with movies like My Friend Dahmer, Star 80, I, Tonya or Party Monster: dramas, with a touch of humor, based on real life homicides.  You know, it's not like those movies would've been better adapted as horror films, but sending people in with the wrong expectations can do more harm than good, leaving people walking out of movies like Army of Darkness scoffing, "that movie wasn't even scary!"  Yeah, gore hounds will probably be enthused about a couple of moments (and one in particular), but what really hits with this movie is how it zeroes in on the human truth of the real people depicted.
So this is the story of Norwegian Black Metal band Mayhem, which famously underwent, and caused, some serious trauma during its reign including the suicide of one their lead singers, a series of church burnings and two murders.  Akerlund is a former black metal musician himself, and while this film is technically based on the 1998 Lords Of Chaos book, he explains in the extras about how he licensed it mainly for the names and rights to the basic thrust, but really wrote the script based on his own research and point of view.  The only other criticism I seeing being regularly laid into this film is that it's inaccurate; but while there's the usual condensing required to turn a complicated, years-long story that involved a ton of people into a single, two hour feature - and yes, like HBO's Chernobyl, it was shot in English with non-native actors (including Rory Culkin as Euronymous) - it struck me how far out of his way Akerlund went to be faithful.
I watched the documentary Until the Light Takes Us in anticipation of this film, and lots of moments and lines of dialogue were clearly lifted right out of it.  And the film is constantly using real locations, supporting characters playing themselves, the authentic music and carefully recreated images.  Yes, it seems like Sky Ferreira's role was composited just so this film could pass the Bechdel Test (hey, also like Chernobyl!), and obviously in cases like this where the only information we have is based on conflicting and biased testimony, some guesses have to be made.  And it's not like a film needs to be doggedly accurate to be great, anyway.  Have you seen what Tarantino's been doing lately?  So, it's all academic.  But I still want to say that this film, which describes itself on-screen as being "based on truth, lies and what actually happened" is far more authentic and accurate than I was lead to believe.
2019 US Fox DVD top; 2019 UK Arrow BD bottom.
Arrow presents Lords Of Chaos slightly matted to its proper aspect ratio of 1.85:1.  Fox doesn't fare quite as well, with a windowboxed and slightly squeezed 1.81:1.  This is a modern, digital film, so there's not a lot of scanning or color correction to go through and potentially get right or wrong.  Arrow's own About the Transfer booklet entry simply reads, "[t]he master was prepared in High Definition by Gunpowder and Sky and delivered to Arrow Films."  And in most other aspects, the two discs look fairly identical, apart from the natural boost in clarity on the blu's part for being in HD.  And Arrow's got the best compression in the industry these days, so it's a very safe bet.

Especially since it seems like the US release from MVD is not such a safe bet, with its lossy and mislabeled audio tracks.  According to DVDTalk, "The packaging and menu offer a Dolby Digital 5.1 Surround Sound track but we don't get that, we get two identical 2.0 mixes. Obviously, a lossless option would have been preferable here and a surround option certainly would have opened things up a bit. We didn't get that."  Whoops!  Well, actually, the Fox DVD got it right, with both the 5.1 and 2.0 mixes.  But being DVD, they're both lossy.  It also includes English and French subtitles.  And of course Arrow gets it right, delivering both the 2.0 and 5.1 mixes in lossless DTS-HD.  So that's a noteworthy win for Arrow, who also include optional English SDH subtitles.
But of course it's not their only win.  The Fox DVD and German blu only include the trailer, the US blu has the trailer and eleven teasers, and the Arrow has two trailers and all eleven teasers... so it already wins just with the trailers.  But, as I said, Arrow's the only special edition on the market, so now watch it completely stomp out the competition.

Sonic Youth's Thurston Moore provides an intro to the film, which is actually rather lengthy, as he talks addresses different opinions on the film and even reads from the afterword he wrote for another book on Mayhen called The Death Archives.  There's just over ten minutes of deleted scenes and outtakes and a 22+ minute with Akerlund himself, which is the center piece of these features.  They also talk to Arion Csihar, who plays his father Attila in the film, and sings one of Mayhem's songs, journalist Jason Arnopp, who wrote the famous Kerrang cover story on Mayhem and who also plays himself in the film, Sam Coleman who plays Metalion and special effects artist Daniel Martin, who has some fun anecdotes and props from the most violent scenes.  There's also a stills gallery, a 22-page booklet with notes by Jonathan Selzer, one of Arrow's standard cards (this one's for Edgar Wright's A Fistful of Fingers) and reversible artwork.
So there's no question about which edition of the film to get.  And if you're on the fence about the film itself, ah man, it's so good.  A fascinating story, great performances all around, and you don't have to any kind of black metal aficionado to appreciate it.

Lisztomania Or Bust

As the great Thirstin Howl III once said, "you can lose, or you can lose. Those are your options."  Was he talking about rap battles or the state of Ken Russell's Lisztomania on home video?  No one can say for sure.  But if you'll bear with me, maybe we can put a better shine on it.  If we were to take one quarter-full glass, in this case the Warner's UK Digital Classics DVD, and another (Warner Archives' US MOD DVDR), and combined them, then it would only take the right attitude to see that our glass is at least half full... right?  It's another one of those combine and create your own special edition situations, except it's still a fairly mediocre special edition.
Lisztomania is Russell's most outrageous picture, which is really saying something.  It's another musical, like Tommy (it even stars Roger Daltry again) with wild, over-the-top imagery, but this time also pulling in Russell's most frequent cinematic obsession: biographing classical composers, in this case the 19th century's Franz Liszt.  There's even a Chaplin-inspired silent segment, a la Peepshow.  So as his composer documentaries grew to be more and more like feature films, it dovetailed perfectly with the musicals.  You might say the only element missing is the cult horror side of his filmography, but uh, did I mention that this film has a vampire?  Oh, and a Frankenstein's monster version of Hitler, created in a dark and spooky castle, who goes on a mass murder rampage with an electric guitar/ machine gun?  Yeah, I'd say this one covers all the bases.
Lisztomania also feels more like a proper narrative movie with musical numbers, because it was created for the screen, as opposed to Tommy, where you can feel its staged production roots.  The title is in reference to the notion that Franz Liszt was an early celebrity, the rock star of his day, and there's a big scene where he performs in front of a great mob of screaming 19th century teenage girls like famous footage of The Beatles on Ed Sullivan.  So this film is big on spectacle (Ringo Starr plays the pope), but has more dramatic weight than Russell's other musicals because it's also exploring the life of a real, person that Russell is invested in, and who butts heads with Wagner and all his future historic implications.
1) 2009 UK Digital Classics DVD; 2) 2012 US Warner Archives DVDR.
The framing is very close across the two discs, apart from the Digital Classics being non-anamorphic (I've left the negative space around the first set of shots to show how that plays out on modern televisions).  We just shift ever so slightly from 2.40:1 to 2.37:1, with WA shaving a little off each side.  Neither disc is interlaced.  And, of course, it's not even a properly pressed disc; it's a burnt DVDR.  The DC DVD has stronger colors compared to the AW DVDR, which is brighter and lower contrast, though that does same some detail from getting crushed out, and gives the image a more naturalistic look.  Both are SD, but being non-anamorphic does necessarily make the DC disc lower res.  It's also PAL, if that bothers you (in a music-centric film, sound can be extra important, so the slight pitch-up could annoy some listeners more than usual).

Speaking of sound, both discs just have the one Dolby stereo track, lossy of course, with no subtitle options.
Now, the big reason the UK DVD is still in the picture, given that WA given us the superior, if still under-whelming presentation, is that only the UK DVD includes an audio commentary by Ken Russell himself.  That said, it's not one of his better commentaries, with Russell sounding tired and leaving long stretches of silence.  But considering he's no longer with us, this is a historic treasure to preserve, and he does have some good insight to contribute, after all.  The UK DVD also has the trailer and an 8-page booklet with notes by Paul Sutton, author of Ken Russell's authorized biography.
So on the one hand, you've got a the reasonably watchable US disc.  But it's still SD, and a DVDR at that.  On the other hand, you've got a pressed UK disc with important special features.  And on neither hand have we got an HD image, subtitles, or a lack of painful compromise.  There was a 2018 DVD reissued in the UK, which I believe at least gave us the film anamorphic on a properly pressed disc, giving it a slight advantage over our US counterpart, but missing the extras.  And of course, DVD-only in 2018, what gives?  It's certainly not something to double or triple-dip for.  Either way, we're still left to import and combine disappointing DVDs to make the best of what we've got.  I suppose that's not as bad as not having these options.  But obviously, the ideal situation would be a new blu-ray with everything.  But so far there's no sign of that happening.  Warner Bros, where are you?

Why Put Your Kids Through College When You Can Watch Orlando In 4k?

1992's Orlando is an adaptation of Orlando: A Biography, fantastic time-bending biography written by Virginia Woolf in 1928.  There are frustratingly few adaptations of Woolf's work to cinema.  There's this, Mrs. Dalloway, To the Lighthouse... I think there are more films about/ referencing her as a famous figure (The Hours, Vita & Virginia, A Room Of One's Own... can we count Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?) than actual films of her stories.  Come on, BBC, where are you guys?  But I guess we're at least lucky that what we did get here is actually an award winning masterpiece.  And Sony clearly recognizes this, including it in their impressive, new 30th Anniversary Collection Sony Pictures Classics 11-film UHD, $300 boxed set.
So, when I say this is a fantastic biography, I mean that in the traditional sense of fantasy (although it's also quite good).  Tilda Swinton's titular Orlando is an ageless nobleman during the time of Elizabeth I (played by Quentin Crisp, which should give you some idea of what's in store).  He falls in love with a foreign princess and follows her to Russia, then winds up in Constantinople where he's made ambassador and turns into a woman.  Orlando never ages, instead simply persisting throughout history, but is far from untouched by the loves (eventually including, yes, Billy Zane) and losses she experiences.  Sally Potter travels the globe to shoot the film's many exotic locales and lives up the opportunity to indulge incredibly in lavish costumes and production values.  But thanks to the source material, Orlando is much more than pageantry; it's witty and touching.  A few scenes and music choices might veer into the overly sentimental, but you won't be able to say this movie doesn't earn those moments.
Orlando debuted on DVD back in 1998.  It was barebones, but it was anamorphic widescreen, which you couldn't always count on back then, even from a major studio like Columbia Tri-Star.  Still, this film calls out for special features, so there was good reason when Artificial Eye released it as a 2-disc special edition in 2003.   But thankfully, Sony included all the extras when they released it on blu in 2010 - they even got Potter to record a new commentary.  That's gone out of print and can be a little tricky to find at a reasonable price these days, but fortunately it's back in a new, higher format as one of 11 4k Ultra HDs in Sony Pictures Classics' 30th Anniversary boxed set.  But the bad news is, like the Columbia Pictures Classics boxed sets, these titles aren't being released separately.  You gotta spring for the whole box... or find someone to sell an individual title to you on EBay, like I did.  šŸ˜‰
1) 1998 DVD; 2) 2003 DVD; 3) 2010 BD; 4) 2022 UHD.
The original DVD is slightly window-boxed to 1.81:1, and the UK DVD is a bit taller at 1.74:1, although that's more about cropping the sides tighter than revealing anything extra under the mattes.  And the BD and UHD fix it to a precise 1.85:1.  But the most obvious change across releases is the color timing.  Surprisingly, the blu is worse than the original DVD: too bright and too red.  Although the UK is the worst, because it just looks pale and washed out, perhaps an attempt to brighten up the low-light scenes, because a good chunk of this film takes place at night or in candle-lit castles.  But you can't really make a case for it anymore in the time of HD.  Sony's new edition is easily the most impressive with its new Dolby Vision/ HDR treatment, which maintains all the detail in the shadows without letting the lights blow out.
BD left; UHD right.
And of course, there's the increased resolution.  It's conventional wisdom that the increased colors of HDR matter more than the actual jump to 4k; but of course it's all on a case by case basis.  And here, the jump from BD to UHD is a real boon.  Besides grain being captured more authentically and soft edges being less pixelated and jagged, small detail is well restored here.  Look at the beauty mark in the shot above, which just looks like a messy rectangle on the right, but is revealed to be a distinct moon shape on the right.  And look how much more beautiful and realistic that earring is now (although I suppose a lot of that is the HDR).

Columbia Tri-Star starts us off with the original stereo mix with optional English subtitles, plus a Spanish dub and Spanish and French subs.  Artificial Eye cuts it down to just the English stereo mix and no subs.  The Sony blu bumps the audio up to DTS-HD and includes both standard and HoH English subtitles.  And the UHD has the same options, except it also brings back the Spanish dub.
Select Scenes Commentary.
So as I said, the 1998 DVD was barebones apart from the trailer.  Most of the extras we have now debuted on the UK DVD set, which in addition to the trailer, included several featurette/ documentaries.  The longest is Orlando In Uzbekistan, a 52-minute on-set look at the filming that took place in, you guessed it, Uzbekistan.  It's very compelling, fly-on-the-wall stuff.  Then there's the similar Orlando Goes To Russia, which runs just over half an hour.  These are truly excellent, and are followed by a short one looking specifically at the angel scene, an on-camera interview with Sally Potter, a 23-minute press conference and 4 photo galleries.  And finally, there's Sally Potter's "Selected Scene Commentary," or "Select Scenes Commentary" depending on which release package you're looking at, which is a little misleading.  You expect one of those audio commentaries where they only talk over selections of the film, like Jennifer Aniston on The Good Girl, right?  But it's actually a short featurette where Potter talks to the camera and about a couple of key scenes.  It's good, though, so at the end of the day who cares what they call it?

The BD and UHD keep all of that except the photo galleries, but better yet include an informal but intelligent audio commentary (a real one this time) with Potter and Swinton.  The UHD comes in its own individual amary case and slipcover.  It doesn't include a booklet or insert per se; but the full 30th Anniversary Collection comes with a 24-page booklet with info about Sony Pictures Classic and some details on each film, including Orlando.
This is a beautiful edition of a very beautiful film, and it's a shame it isn't available separately.  Although the other films in the set are worth your time, too (some more than others, of course); so you should probably jump on it if you can afford it.  Otherwise, you'll have to trawl EBay for your favorites or hope something pops up in another region in the ensuing years.  It's frustrating how Sony is releasing this in such a restricted capacity, but at least they're still putting out discs like this.

Let's Do Dune

1984's Dune is David Lynch's least favorite on his films, and it's mine as well.  But it's still a Lynch film, and indeed one of my greatest joys is picking out all of Lynch's supporting players like Jack Nance, Freddie Jones, Dean Stockwell, Brad Dourif, Everett McGill tucked away in all the supporting roles.  Not to mention Kyle MacLachlan, of course.  There's a whole other, ethereal layer of creepy ambiance at play if you're watching Dune after having seen Blue Velvet.  Purists may get mad at all the little creative touches he inserted into the film, from the weirding modules to the infamous cat milking machine, or just the way Lynch stylizes his dream sequences, but those are my favorite parts.
Maybe that makes me a Frank Herbert philistine; but on the other hand, I've seen the other adaptations of Dune, and frankly, apart from a few little controversies, Lynch seems to be telling the same story in much the same way, with most of the scenes and dialogue faithfully reproduced.  So box office history not withstanding, I think it's as good a Dune as you can get and a perfectly enjoyable Hollywood sci-fi blockbuster that I certainly enjoy revisiting more than any Disney Star Wars flick or whatever.  Plus my dad loves it.  So I've been keeping up with its legacy on home video disc; we might as well cover it here.

Because Toto's music is delightful, the sets, costumes and production design are perfect, most of the pre-CGI effects still stand up against anything released today and even the non-Lynchian cast is first rate.  I mean, holy shit: Jurgen Prochnow, Max von Sydow, Patrick Stewart, Linda Hunt... this movie doesn't deserve these people.  I can appreciate if Sting in a super villain speedo is a step too far for you, but come on... open your heart up to joy.
On the other hand, I can't refuse to stand by fans of the novel who criticize the controversial decision to change the ending, in such a way that suggests Lynch didn't even appreciate the whole point of the book.  I will talk around it so as not to spoil the ending, but yes, it always struck me as not just super cheesy, but a real botch of the conclusion.  Was it imposed on him by Dino de Laurentiis?  Maybe, maybe not, but that doesn't make it a forgivable sin on the film's part, even if it excuses Lynch himself.  More recently, however, I've thought about it further... this was intended to be a series of films.  Star Wars had already become a sequelized franchise by then, and everybody's eyes were definitely on that prize.  So you can see why the studios were displeased with Lynch after this premiered.  But if you think about how the story could have been intended to continue in the follow-up, unless they were considering really forging their own path far away from the source material, they must have envisioned the unpopular ending elements being subverted early on in the sequel.  It's possible I'm giving Lynch too much credit, since I've never heard him say anything like this, but when you really think it through, it does seem the most likely: the ending was set-up to intentionally mislead viewers, who then would've been surprised to learn the truth of the lead character (i.e. the same way he was written).  I see the ending as just a little plot twist that would've fallen back in line with Herbert (who, after all, was on board for everything the filmmakers did, minus the exclusion of one scene)'s vision had the series been allowed to continue.  ...Or I'm wrong.  🤷
I should also address the extended cut, a.k.a. the TV cut.  It was assembled for Dune's broadcast television debut, and to be clear, Lynch was 100% against it.  Lynch's relationship with Dune can be a little confusing.  He doesn't talk about it often, and after its box office failure, generally seems to have put it behind him.  But he didn't take his name off of it.  That's only true of this extended cut, which is not only credited to the famous DG pseudonym Alan Smithee, but to writer Judas Booth.  That ought to give you some idea of how he feels about this.  Still, it's got footage in it that can't be found in the theatrical version, or the deleted scenes found on many DVD editions, so you can't blame fans for being curious.  Most notably, it includes an extended prologue, where a narrator (an unknown male, not Virginia Madsen) tells us the whole history of how people were dominated by machines, developed their mental powers and so on, all spoken over a series of cheesy illustrations[pictured above].  A bunch of deleted scenes are restored, and some scenes are slightly rearranged.

The extended cut's about 40 minutes longer than the theatrical, so we're not just talking about a few tiny shavings restored here and there.  But a lot of it just feels like exposition or dialogue reinforcing points already made, presumably to help audiences confused by a story that really isn't nearly as complicated as its reputation suggests. Plus, frankly, a lot of the new edits are pretty clumsy.  So at the end of the day, I'd say any devoted fan will want to see this once, but the theatrical cut is still the definitive version to both start with and return to.
The story of Dune on disc is complicated, but not as overwhelming as it might appear at first.  Universal initially released it as a widescreen but non-anamorphic barebones DVD in 1998.  That was all we had for a long time, so it really pushed fans to import.  Personally, I went with the 2004 2-disc set from Sanctuary in the UK, which was anamorphic and included some good extras, so we've got that here in the comparisons.  But Universal eventually woke up, and released a semi-special edition in 2006, which was now anamorphic, included both cuts of the film, and had at least a few extras (deleted scenes and four featurettes).  Then, in 2010, it was time to bring Dune into HD, and Universal released a blu-ray with all the same extras, but just the one cut.  And at the end of 2021, Arrow restored the film in 4k and released it as a special edition 3-disc set, on both blu and UHD.  That pretty much brings us to the end of the story, though some super fans might be compelled to import even fancier editions from overseas for additional extras and that TV cut, which apparently is now "officially withdrawn from release in the US."
1) 1998 Universal DVD; 2) 2004 Sanctuary DVD; 3) 2010 Universal BD;
4) 2021 Arrow BD; 5) 2021 Arrow UHD
.
So the film veers only slightly from its proper aspect ratio.  The original DVD is slightly wider at 2.38:1, the UK DVD opens up to 2.30:1, and then all of the HD options are actually 2.35:1.  But the framing shifts around more inside of that frame.  The Sanctuary DVD is the tightest (it's also lightly windowboxed, and would at least sync up with the others a little more if those thin mattes were lifted).  The Universal DVD has considerably more on the left than the Universal blu, but a smidgen less on the right.  Anyway, it all ends up with the new Arrow transfers revealing the most on all four sides.  Of course the resolution keeps bumping up each stage... even between the two DVDs, since being non-anamorphic crunches the whole picture size from 720 to 538 pixels wide.

Now, the Universal BD was already pretty solid, especially for a 2010 disc.  But Arrow's new restoration, scanned in 4k from the OCN, is still a distinct improvement.  Even on the 1080p BD, grain is much more natural and thoroughly captured, looking genuinely filmlike where Universal's soft patchiness merely suggested it.  This also reveals gentle patterns in the backgrounds and costumes that had previously been smoothed away.  And it's even more perfect in the genuine 4k of the UHD, with Dolby Vision HDR capturing more nuance and noticeably more natural flesh-tones.
The Universal DVD just has a 5.1 remix along with a French dub and Spanish subtitles.  Sanctuary has the English Dolby Stereo track and the 5.1 mix, though disappointingly, still no subtitle options, and they ditch the foreign language options.  Universal's blu again loses the original stereo mix, but at least brings the 5.1 up to DTS-HD and includes optional English subtitles along with a French dub and French & Spanish subs.  Finally, Arrow gives us what we wanted all along: the original stereo mix in lossless DTS-HD - as well as the 5.1 - with optional English subtitles.  This is why studios need the boutique labels like Arrow... they just can't seem to get these things right on their own.

Again, the original Universal DVD was barebones apart from the theatrical trailer, which is especially disappointing for a sci-fi blockbuster like this, even if it did under perform in its day.  So Sanctuary having a second disc of extras, even if it wasn't super packed, was a very welcome improvement.  It's main feature was a 38-minute making of documentary called Impressions of Dune with great interviews from MacLachlan, Dino's daughter Raffaella de Laurentiis (this was one of her first movies), Harlan Ellison, David Ansen of Newsweek, and many key members of the crew (production designer Golda Oppenheim is especially entertaining).  We also get original EPK featurette and a very brief (under 2 minutes) interview with Frank Herbert himself.  The trailer's here, too, and it came with a little fold-out insert with notes.
That exclusive Sanctuary interview.
Universal's blu loses all of that stuff (even the trailer).  But in a fair trade, they introduce almost 20 minutes of deleted scenes and four featurettes interviewing members of the crew about the effects, design, etc.

But now it's time for the big boys to take the field, as Arrow comes along with its 3-disc set.  There are two commentaries, both of which are, eh, pretty good, by critics Paul M. Sammon and Mike White (not that Mike White).  Impressions of Dune, the deleted scenes, the four featurettes, the vintage promo featurette and the trailer are all back... the only hold-out being that brief Herbert interview.  Otherwise, they've got everything from both previous editions.  And that's far from all.  There's a fun featurette by Ballyhoo on the merchandising of Dune, a featurette on Toto and new on-camera interviews with make-up artist Giannetto de Rossi, Golda Offenheim and a short one with make-up effects artist Christopher Tucker.  They also have a clip of Grindhouse's Paul Smith interview from their Pieces disc!  Plus, they have a second trailer, radio spots, a VHS promo and five galleries.
And they released a bunch of different versions with regard to the swag and packaging.  There was the standard amary case (with reversible artwork), the steelbook, the amaray case in a thick slipbox and even the steelbook in the slipbox (the one I have here).  It includes a 60-page, properly bound full-color booklet with notes on the film by Andrew Nette, Christian McCrea, Charlie Brigden, Alan Splet & Chris Rodley, a second 100-page bound art booklet showcasing designs, storyboards, etc, a large fold-out double-sided poster, six lobby card reproductions, and as ever, a card for an upcoming Arrow release, in this case The Stylist.
A scene clearly lifted from Phantasm. šŸ˜‰
By the way, I mentioned other adaptations.  Lynch's was the first, but not the only production of Dune.  In 2000, there was the Sci Fi Channel version, which looks a little goofy with its awful CGI and some corny actors (though they did rope William Hurt into playing the Duke), but is otherwise reasonably competent.  Spread across three episodes, it contains a few key scenes from the book that were missing from Lynch's version, including that banquet scene Herbert always said he wanted.  And of course, there's the new Warner Bros/ HBOMax version, which is by far the most drab and self-serious of them, but again tells the same story the same way, down to specific scenes and dialogue (except, of course, it lops off the second half for the pending part 2).  I'd recommend watching each version at least once.  But if you're really interested in Dune variants, I'd actually recommend the 2013 documentary Jodorowsky's Dune.
It digs deep into what almost was the first cinematic adaptation of Dune, back in the 70s by cult surrealist Alejandro Jodorowsky (El Topo, Santa Sangre).  What's amazing about it is all the talent being assembled, from Dan O'Bannon to Orson Welles.  Admittedly, I'm not sure just how likely this vision was to make it to the big screen (Jodorowsky insisted it be 12-14 hours long), but this was an earnest attempt with a lot of art created by collaborators like HR Giger and Moebius, that we get to see in this doc.  Salvadore Dali, Mick Jagger and Udo Kier were set to be in the cast.  In some ways, it's more of a fever dream than an actual movie, but this movie lets us in on the vision.  And it's not pure fantasy - they had secured the film rights and millions in funding, just not enough; and it eventually fell through, allowing it to fall into the hands of de Laurentiis. 
1) 2014 Sony DVD; 2) 2014 Sony BD.
As a documentary which incorporates mixed media, naturally the aspect ratio shifts around a bit, but the main body of the film, i.e. the new interview with Jodorowsy, is in 1.78:1.  But despite this being a matching release in a combo-pack, there is a slight difference in the AR on the DVD and Blu.  First of all, it's not perfectly 1.78:1, there's a black bar running along the top, which feels like an error, something you wouldn't expect from a Sony disc.  And the bar is thicker on the blu.  So the DVD is a few pixels taller, and then it's also stretched vertically, so it crops off a little along the top and bottom (notice Alejandro's thumb is only visible in the second shot).  It's all very minor, and nothing you'd even notice in casual viewing, but it is a peculiarity.  Besides that, it's an attractive HD image that naturally comes off as just a little softer on DVD.

The film has a strong 5.1 mix, in DTS-HD on the blu.  Also included are optional English subtitles, both standard and HoH, plus French and Spanish subs and even an English descriptive track.

There's not a ton of extras, but at least we get a bunch of deleted scenes, which extend some of the interviews and follow a few tangents.  There's also the theatrical trailer, and a host of bonus trailers that play on start-up.
Circling back to the original film, previous releases were fine for their time; but Arrow is the first to finally, truly get it right.  It's easily the release I'd recommend for most people, especially those who see this as a more of an interesting failure than a beloved classic.  But for those who really eat and breathe this film, I'd be remiss not to point readers towards Koch's 7-disc Ultimate Edition, released earlier this year in Germany (not to be confused with Koch's limited edition 3-disc UHD/ BD set they released there last year).  It has the same 4k restoration on both DVD and UHD and all the Arrow extras, but also has both cuts, a third fan edit cut, a soundtrack CD, additional audio interviews and a feature-length Ballyhoo documentary that was intended for the Arrow set, but left off because they couldn't finish it in time for Arrow's deadline.  That's a whole lot of Dune, and it ain't cheap; but you know if you need it.

Sanctuary, meanwhile, is still the only release with that Herbert interview.