My DVDs of My Dinner With Andre

There are a handful of films where I feel like DVDExotica hasn't even fully formed yet if they're not to be found on this site.  My Dinner With Andre is one of them.  ...Valentina is another, if you were curious.  Not just because I'm a big fan of the film and it's been on my "to cover" list since before I even started this site.  Although, yes, that's certainly true.  But for whatever reason, largely subconscious, everything from the nature of the film itself to its history on home video feels like a necessary, load-bearing building block for what DVDExotica was intended to be.  So here we finally go.

Update 11/20/22 - 4/25/26: It's Update Megaweek, and while I don't have another edition of My Dinner With Andre to share with you today, I have something perhaps more interesting I've recently discovered.  A DVD release of a related documentary called Andre Gregory: Before and After Dinner.
This film's hard-coded into the zeitgeist, to some almost infamously, as the movie where two people just sit and talk over dinner for two hours.  Besides little parodies in everything from The Simpsons (the My Dinner With Andre arcade game) to Waiting for Guffman (My Dinner With Andre action figures), there have been at least two legitimate feature films titled My Dinner With ____ (Jimi and Herve, neither of which had the guts to maintain the single conversation format along with their titles).  There are so many television episodes, short films, articles... But none of that really matters; it's just a great movie: poignant, funny, thoroughly unpretentious and surprisingly re-watchable.
It's such a great collaboration.  Wallace Shawn really comes into his own here as a performer and writer, who, sure, is ostensibly playing himself, but is also doing a lot more than just speaking in his own voice.  And you couldn't cast his foil any more perfectly than Andre Gregory.  But it's not just two theater guys talking theater, or existential philosophy, but a layered play taking place with deliberately crafted characters.  And the real collaboration I'm talking about isn't actually the two of them, but between Shawn and director Louis Malle who sees the vitality in the material and brings it to life (with the help, it's always fun to remember, of Lloyd Kaufman and Troma films!) with his mise en scene.  He's doing so much more than I think people realize, because they just see two guys sitting at a table.  But for example, do you really think it's a coincidence that in the exact moment Andre says "an act of murder has been committed" describing the times he calls his doorman Jimmy, the waiter walks behind them?  This isn't documentary, that extra was directed to cross camera during that line.  And just a minute later, when Wallace is saying, "if I were to confront myself that I'm sharing this world with a starving person in Africa somewhere, well, I wouldn't feel so great about myself," we see a black busboy clearing the table in the mirror behind him.  While he says, "I blot those people right out of my perception," he's actively ignoring that busboy.  This film is so rich.
Fox Lorber first issued this film on DVD all the way back in 1998, and it looks it.  That fullscreen and barebones disc was all we had, though, until Criterion picked up the DVD rights and turned it into a 2-disc special edition.  In 2015, Criterion upgraded it to BD, sold separately or as part of their 'Andre Gregory & Wallace Shawn 3 Films' boxed set, with Vanya On 42nd St and A Master Builder.
1) 1998 Fox Lorber DVD; 2) 2009 Criterion DVD; 3) 2015 Criterion BD.
So yes, the Fox Lorber DVD is fullscreen.  In fact, it's at an excessively skinny 1.29:1.  Criterion's DVD corrects this to 1.64:1 (the case says 1.66:1, but okay, close enough), which the BD maintains.  To be fair the old disc is at least not interlaced (neither are either Criterions) and more or less open matte, with plenty of extra vertical information, though you can see Criterion's adjusted framing does reveal more along the sides.  Even more obvious is Criterion's color correction, which you can see was desperately needed.  The Fox disc is overcast with reds and yellows, and the saturation peaks are blinding (I can't tear my eyes away from those blue glasses on the shelf behind the bar in the first set of shots).  And the boost in clarity to HD is remarkable.  It was scanned in 2k from the original 16mm A/B negative; just look at the clear and sharp detail that was previously a smeary mess in 1998.  The grain is well captured and thoroughly displayed.  The encode leaves some light macroblocking, but what do you want?  It's not a UHD, it's a 2015 2k BD, and it looks better than I would've expected even after seeing the 2009 DVD.

All three discs present the original mono in 2.0, though it's been remastered for the Criterions and you can hear the difference.  The Fox Lorber DVD also lacks subtitles, which both Criterions provide.
Fox Lorber's DVD is completely barebones, but Criterion's DVD cooked up some fantastic special features.  Primarily, there are all new, half hour interviews with Shawn and Gregory, both conducted by Noah Baumbach, which illuminate just about everything you'd want to know about their thinking behind the film and the effect its had on their careers afterwards.  Unfortunately, Malle had already passed, but his perspective and insight is rescued by a 1984 episode of the BBC show Arena called My Dinner With Louis: The Films of Louis Malle, where Shawn interviews Malle about his body of work at dinner for almost an hour.  I just wish they'd spent a little more time on My Dinner With Andre, but they get to it eventually.  Also included is a 30-page booklet with notes by Amy Taubin and introductions by Shawn and Gregory.

The blu-ray doesn't add anything more, but it preserves everything from their DVD, including the booklet.
Still hungry for more, though?  Then allow me to recommend the stand-alone Cinema Guild DVD release of 2013's Andre Gregory: Before and After Dinner.  As the title suggests, it's a documentary about the life of Andre Gregory.  Directed by his wife, Cindy Kleine, it doesn't focus on My Dinner With Andre in particular, but it's certainly in here, and of course Wallace Shawn is on-hand throughout.  Kleine takes a light-hearted and affectionate approach (somehow Mr Skin doesn't have an entry for Gregory's full frontal scene here), but also includes some rare footage for the serious fans, like his famous, slightly surreal Broadway adaptation of Alice In Wonderland or his audition tape for The Last Temptation of Christ.  I wish she'd questioned the veracity of the stories he has a penchant for telling a little deeper, but she has a lot of ground to cover.  Gregory is on his thirteenth(!) year of rehearsals for The Master Builder during the time of filming, so we see a lot of that.  it can be a bit boring at times if you're not particularly interested in this guy's life, as the filmmaking itself isn't exactly stylish and impressive.  But it does take an eyebrow raising turn when his father is seriously accused of being a major Nazi collaborator.  So there's something for everyone here.
2013 Cinema Guild DVD.
The film is anamorphic widescreen 1.78:1.  As you can see in that first shot in the graveyard, there is some interlacing.  But that's surely down to the cameras they used to shoot this thing, and nothing Cinema Guild did wrong, because insert footage like that clip from Demolition Man above is not interlaced.  Otherwise, this looks about as good as you can hope for, considering most of this was shot handheld on the fly.  Though I do wonder if Kleine has an HD version on-hand; after all, this has played theatrically; and this came out in 2013, not 2003.  Anyway, the audio is your basic Dolby Digital 2.0 ad even though the packaging and most online listings don't mention it, does include optional English subtitles.

And there's even more in the extras.  It basically just has deleted scenes and outtakes, but there's about a half hour of each, so that turns out to be fairly substantial.  And apart from one outtake where the cameraman is filming the floor, finding focus and adjusting the white balance while Gregory speaks to a theater class, it's impossible to tell what distinguishes the outtakes from the deleted scenes.  It's all just more stuff that didn't quite make the final cut.  There's also the trailer and some bonus trailers, plus an insert with notes by Andre himself.
I just love this film; and I was so happy to be able to get it on disc.  And what's more, I was pleasantly surprised how worthwhile each subsequent upgrade was.  I would've been quite happy with each older edition, but Criterion really did right by it.  Twice.  If there's a UHD, you bet I'll be there, too.  But if not, this blu is already all I need.  Or, actually, the whole Andre & Gregory boxed set is essential, because My Dinner With Andre is still the best of the three, but they're all superb.

Watching The Seventh Seal Grow Even Beyond Criterion

Ingmar Bergman's The Seventh Seal is pretty much the art film that comes to mind when people think of art films.  The cloaked figure of death playing a game of chess with a knight on the rocky beach, or leading a parade of departing souls across a bleak landscape... it's been parodied, imitated and referenced that it's one of the most iconic images of cinema - especially foreign cinema - that people who've never even seen the film will recognize it.  So it's fitting that this is sort of a flagship title that Criterion has released again and again.  Six times now, if you count the laserdiscs, since we've just had another brand new remaster this year (or technically last year - happy New Year's, gang!) with their massive boxed set of Ingmar Bergman's Cinema.

Update 1/3/19 - 11/12/22: Boy oh boy, I do not feel ready to start replacing the discs in my massive Criterion box yet.  But BFI has released The Seventh Seal on UHD, so here we are.

Also, for the final day of Update Week 2022, I went back and added not just the Llamentol BD of Middlemarch, but the whole George Eliot Collection and corresponding US DVDs.
But it's not the kind of impenetrable art film people are leery of when films like this are brought up.  It's not the kind of film where you lean over to your spouse to ask, "why did the cowboy tie those balloons to the bicycle?"  And you somehow need to intuit that the bicycle represents Mother and releasing your fear of aging or blahbitty blah blah.  Those films exist, too, from the early collaborations between Luis Bunuel and Salvador Dali or the works of Maya Deren (the original chess on the beach!), to stuff like Richard Foreman's Strong Medicine and even quite recently with Darren Aronofsky's Mother.  Say what you will about that film, but it's got to be the most popular everything's-a-symbol-for-something-else movie in a long time.  ...The Seventh Seal is not that.  It's a very simple story slowly and directly told that any dummy can follow and relate to as easily as any cop show or sitcom.  The only symbolism you need to figure out is that the dark hooded figure who keeps ending everybody's life and who everyone calls Death... represents death.
Not that this is as shallow and unfulfilling as your average cop show or sitcom.  It's a very relatable existential journey.  Admittedly, this isn't my favorite type of Bergman film... if you can even call it a type, when it stands out so uniquely from Bergman's body of work or even cinema in general, like a lighthouse surrounded by the sea.  But it does fall into that drier, more intellectual side of the bin.  You know, I'm much more a fan of the emotionally, relationship driven films of his later career.  Give me Fanny & Alexander or Autumn Sonata any day!  And Bergman scholar Peter Cowie once wittily and aptly said, "fans groan when Bergman approaches a church."  This is smack dab in the middle of his Christian crisis of faith phase.  But it's just so well made, with brilliant set pieces and authentically period production values.  Now I've seen it a whole bunch of times, but years ago, I'd approach it with trepidation... will it still hold up?  Or will it feel like sitting through a classroom lecture?  Was I just easily impressed with it because I was younger and its reputation is monolithic?  But no, it's one of those movies, if you turn it on the TV, I'll sit down and get pulled right into it.
For those who don't know, The Seventh Seal is the story of a squire and his knight, recently returned to their plague-ridden homeland from the Crusades.  When Death comes along to take them into the next world, the knight delays him by challenging him to a game of chess.  So long as the game stretches on, they will remain, because the knight is determined to discover the ultimate answers to life's mystery before he lets go.  But death can't be outrun and he can't be cheated, so they only have a short time to quest for meaning, during which they journey with a wandering troupe of players, a blacksmith and his wife, and a devious seminarist who all get unwittingly drawn into Death's past.  A strong literary quality, Gunnar Fischer's stark compositions and powerful performances by some of Bergman's greatest actors including Max von Sydow, Gunnar Björnstrand, Bibi Andersson and comedian Nils Poppe all come together to make this one of the most unforgettable films of all time.
Criterion first released The Seventh Seal on DVD back in 1999, spine #11.  In fact, their first laserdisc edition was spine #10, dating all the way back to 1987, and yes, that was a special edition with a commentary, too.  Then, in 2009, they remastered it for HD, releasing it on DVD and blu with even more special features.  But 2009's pretty old for as far as blu-rays go, so I don't suppose it's too surprising that when they included it in their massive 2018 boxed set of Ingmar Bergman's Cinema, they gave it a fresh scan and all around new edition.  It's fascinating to watch how far this film has come in Criterion's hands.  But now we get to see it go even further beyond their reach as the BFI have taken it into the latest format as a 2-disc BD/ 4k Ultra HD combo over in the UK.
1) 1999 DVD; 2) 2009 DVD; 3) 2009 BD; 4) 2018 BD;
5) 2021 BD; 6) 2021 UHD.


Criterion's first DVD is so old, it probably would've been non-anamorphic.  But fortunately the film's fullscreen, so I think we dodged a bullet there.  Despite the film always being in the same AR, though, I left the negative space around the first set of images to show the interesting, differing ways Criterion handled the pillar- and/or window-boxing over the years.  Most curiously, the concurrent 2009 discs are actually quite different in that regard, with the DVD being distinctly windowboxed around all four sides, whereas its supposed blu-ray mirror is not.  And as you can see, it's not because they just left it like the old DVD, which only has slight horizontal slivers.  And even between the two blus, seeing them stacked one on top of the other clearly illustrates how the widths of the image don't line up with each other, as the actual aspect ratio shifts between releases, ever widening as it goes from 1.31:1 to 1.32:1 to 1.34:1 and finally landing at 1.38:1.  In the case of the new blu, it's because the new scan is unveiling a little bit more on the sides, but in the case of the 2009 blu, I think it's just been slightly horizontally stretched.  And yes, the old DVD does actually have a few pixels of extra vertical picture even the latest blu lacks.

But these shifts in aspect ratio are really slight, and none of the discs, even the 1999 DVD, suffer from issues like interlacing, DNR, burnt in subtitles or any other issues that tend to plague lesser releases.  They're all pretty high quality discs from Criterion.  So yes, the newer versions are better and the DVDs aren't in HD, but by and large, even the oldest DVD still holds up pretty well.  You could slap that on your TV today and it'd still look pretty good.
2009 BD left; 2018 BD right.
Still, the blus look even better.  2009 suggests an old master, before 2 and 4k scans came into prominence; but it holds up quite well.  Detail is strong, black and contrast levels are bold, the film elements themselves are clean and well preserved.  This would've been an A+ blu in 2009 and still rate a solid A today.  But not only is the latest blu a fresh 4k scan, but this time they were able to take it from the 35mm original camera negative.  So it's a slightly darker, less contrast-y image, as it's able to rely on it's broader range of light and shadow.  And more noticeably, the grain is a lot finer; it's actually quite light here.  Has it been slightly DNR'd?  If so, it's not to the point of destroying anything in the image; but this new scan doesn't pull out much by way of additional detail either.  Instead, it mostly seems to give us a more direct view of what has been captured, without the additional interference we've always lived with from the grain generated by later generation film sources.  To be a little clearer, I'd say it's about a dead tie between the two blus in terms of detail, grain and resolution, with one benefit trading off for another; but the new version wins in terms of the brightness and contrast.

BFI is still using the same Swedish Film Institute 4k restoration (their included 1080p is barely distinguishable from the Criterion apart from a very slight framing tweak), but now it's presented on a genuine 4k disc and with Dolby Vision HDR.  Honestly, the latest BDs already look pretty terrific, with expertly captured grain and fine detail.  But there is more life and with extra detail in the highlights and more authentic curves up close.  And that questionably too light grain that I thought might've been DNR'd?  Not a problem here at all.

Every version, from 1999-2018, features both the original Swedish mono track (in LPCM on the blus) and an English dub with optional English subtitles.  The 1999 DVD has some sibilance scratching that the later editions clean up.  It's no great loss, but it has to be pointed out that BFI drops the English dub.  Apart from some echo and background hiss, the English dub's not terrible, I suppose; but when you're familiar with Sydow's distinctive voice, hearing the milquetoast American Joe voice they give him sounds a little goofy.
In terms of special features, the 1999 DVD is interesting since it has a few minor things left off of future editions.  One thing that's never left us, though, is the audio commentary by Criterion's in-house Bergman scholar, Peter Cowie, which debuted on the 1987 laserdisc and has been an interesting and informed companion on every subsequent release.  There's also the trailer and a 4-page booklet with notes by Cowie.  But then we get to the 1999 exclusive stuff.  First off is a restoration demonstration.  You can understand why they'd leave that off, since it's touting a transfer that's since been replaced on later, newer discs.  It's also interlaced, which makes their restoration look a lot less impressive than it is.  So it's hardly anything to cry over.  But what's more interesting that later discs have discarded is two film clips, from Bergman's The Magician and Wild Strawberries, with audio commentary by Cowie.  Together, they total about 18 minutes, and are basically there, I suppose, to put Bergman's work into an educated context.  I suppose Criterion would just prefer you bought their Magician and Wild Strawberries discs, and anyway, they'll make up for what little they lose by how much they wind up adding.
The 1999 restoration demonstration
The 2009 releases include an all new introduction Bergman recorded for The Seventh Seal during the filming of the documentary of Bergman Island.  Speaking of which, Criterion has also included the documentary film, Bergman Island.  I've already covered that documentary thoroughly on its own page here, so I'll just let you know real quickly here that the version on the Criterion discs is an abridged version, cutting the original 173 minute doc down by more than half to just 83 minutes, so you'll still probably want to track down the uncut version.  Still, as a freebie, it's nice to get here.

The 2009 versions also throw in new video essays by Peter Cowie and Woody Allen, an almost 20 minute audio interview with Max von Sydow, and a nice career overview (again by Cowie) appropriately entitled Bergman 101.  It also includes a longer (24 for the DVD, 28 for the blu) booklet with notes by Gary Giddins.  The 2018 edition keeps everything from the 2009 discs, but adds nothing new, with the obvious exception, of course, for the fact that it comes packaged with all the other Bergman films, and the extras associated with those.  The set also includes a bonus disc with several docs and features about Bergman in general, but there's nothing else Seventh Seal-specific.  The Giddins essay from the previous booklets is back again, too, in the box's massive 248 page book.
And now BFI has its own, entirely unique set of special features.  Firstly, there' a brand new commentary by Kat Ellinger, which is... eh, fine.  She spends like half an hour going on and on about how this film can be considered folk horror, which is like the latest Film Twitter buzzword.  And while I don't disagree, it's a pretty simple, easily made point that doesn't require endless convincing.  So the commentary starts to feel like a bit of a chore to sit through.  Still, it's the only commentary on the UK release, and she certainly provides all the fundamental background info and insight one would ask of an expert commentary.  And if you have heard all the US stuff, she gives something different.  So at the end of the day, I'd say it's not bad but a little under-cooked, and if you're not too fussed about expert commentaries in the first place, and/ or already know your Bergman fairly well, you wouldn't be doing yourself much of a disservice by skipping it.  But hey, good to get.

More compelling is the roughly 15 minutes behind-the-scenes footage narrated by Ian Christie (the case says "optional commentary," but the only way to turn it off is to lower the volume down to 0 on your television).  This isn't really a new feature; it's been on UK releases since Tartan's 50th Anniversary DVD in 2007, but for whatever reason, Criterion's never gotten there hands on it.  And as actual, surviving vintage footage giving us a real look behind the making of this classic, it's fairly essential.  Christie's commentary is nice, too, especially since the footage is silent anyway.  BFI also includes Bergman's short documentary about his mother, Karin's Face again, which you can see comparison shots of on my Best Intentions page (though I'll save you a click: it's the same transfer every time).  And this also comes with a glossy 12-page booklet with an essay by Jessica Kiang, the trailer, and a slipcover.
So, each subsequent release of Criterion's The Seventh Seal has been a nice little upgrade.  And now BFI's UHD is another.  And it nets us some different, and in one instance quite important, special features.  One might balk at re-buying a film so many times, but in the case of such an important and visually arresting classic such as this one, I think most serious film fans will be happy for each opportunity.

Dennis Potter's Two Dark Visions of Wonderland: Alice and Dreamchild

Dennis Potter has written so many great, rare and unreleased television plays for the BBC over the years. A disappointingly substantial number of them have yet to be made available in any form, while others are out only on some pretty obscure discs. One of his earliest, and long unreleased, is Alice, a "Wednesday Play" from 1965: a more realistic and tragic take on the relationship between Lewis Carroll and the real Alice Liddell who he crafted his stories for.

Update 9/10/15 - 11/11/22: Kino has given Dreamchild a much needed upgrade to blu.  'nuff said!
Here we see Carroll, excellently played by George Baker, as a reclusive, stuttering professor with an undying devotion to the very under-aged daughter of his dean (Upstairs Downstairs' David Langton). Nothing overtly sexual or immoral happens, but Alice's mother slowly catches on that there's something inappropriate in this man's attentions to her the girl, spending all of his time with her, buying her gifts, inviting her over to be photographed. But at the same time, something genuinely beautiful and innocent is developing out of his true feelings for her: these wonderful stories he creates to win her affections.
Throughout the film, we see moments and characters that inspire some of the most famous scenes from Alice In Wonderland, and occasionally we enter into the storybook world itself. It's an honest look at human relations seldom examined, and a psychological character study too honest to simply present us with anyone to demonize or romanticize. When Carroll ultimately takes his first book of Wonderland stories to an appreciative publisher, they're all too eager to have their illustrator visit the real Alice for their pages, but there's the awkward moment when Carroll must explain to them that the family now objects to the entire affair.
In 1985, Potter wrote the screenplay for a film called Dreamchild, which is often referred to as a remake of Alice. That would certainly make sense... a small but highly praised BBC teleplay getting turned into a feature film happens often enough, even specifically with Potter's works; and certainly this film has many of the same themes and a rough premise in common with Alice. In fact, it has a few scenes replayed word for word. But I really don't think it's fair to call this a remake; it's actually quite a different film, that just happens to stem from the same root idea.
Certainly, it's another story of "the real Alice" and an implied darker, even abusive, relationship between her and Carroll. But it's quite a different story. Despite its title, Alice was about Carroll; Alice was just the catalyst. Dreamchild, on the other hand, is about Alice. This film is set in the 1930s, when Alice is now 80, visiting America for the very first time because she's receiving an honorary degree from an ivy league university as part of a celebration for Carroll's centenary. She's surprised to learn just what a cultural icon the book has become, as she's instantly beset by reporters who don't understand how haunted she is by the story's characters (angry monsters brilliantly brought to life by Jim Henson). In Alice, Carroll seemed to simply want more than there could be with Alice, but in Dreamchild, we're left to infer that something immoral did indeed happen, and she's a survivor forced by the book's lasting popularity to confront her demons to her very last days.
There is so much story that isn't even hinted at in Alice. Peter Gallagher is a major character playing a reporter who Alice rejects but eventually warms to after he shows her how much money there is to be made in exploiting her newfound American fame. There's a whole subplot, then, about her young assistant who she brought over from England and tries to keep under her thumb (a sort of mirror, where she tries to keep Lucy infantilized just like Carroll wished of her). The scenes this has in common with Alice are all flashbacks from her youth with Carroll, this time played by Ian Holme. Again, those scenes are the same down to the precise word; but they only make up maybe 15% of this movie, which has an entirely different tone and very different things to say. Certainly production values are much higher here - compare the gryphon and the mock turtle in the screenshots from each production above. But I have to say, key scenes - like the one where Liddell's family asks Carroll to recite a silly poem from his book and Alice and her sisters laugh and get distracted by their boyfriends, because they've outgrown his childrens' stories - are more heartbreaking in Alice. Truly, though, they're two very different and excellent original works by Potter; and you'd be doing yourself a disservice to only see one or the other.
Both of these films were unavailable for ages. However, if you'll pardon a brief detour (it'll tie in eventually), what was released, was a rather smart 1966 BBC adaptation of Alice In Wonderland by Jonathan Miller, who also directed the terrific Whisper and I'll Come To You. This is a faithful adaptation of the story by someone who greatly disliked the Disney cartoon, and it features a brilliant cast including John Gielguld, Peter Sellers, Michael Redgrave and Peter Cook. It's a more mature version, with a strong score by Ravi Shankar and all the characters (the white rabbit, etc) portrayed simply as humans, and the entire adventure as a dream.
I used to have the BFI DVD of it, which had some excellent features, including an audio commentary by Miller, a vintage featurette on Shankar's scoring process, and an old silent film version of Alice In Wonderland from 1908 with commentary by a BFI expert. But I upgraded that old edition for this US DVD when it came out in 2010, as it carried over all of those extras but also included the DVD debut of Potter's Alice! I kind of wish I'd hung onto that BFI disc (also released in the US by Home Vision), because look at the ghosting in that screenshot above. I'm pretty sure that's a PAL to NTSC conversion issue the original UK disc didn't have. But I'd have bought it anyway, just for Alice. I would've bought Alice on DVD just by itself, because it's terrific. I don't care if they've tucked it away as an extra; it's an amazing package.
And Dreamchild? That finally came out as just an MOD DV-R from MGM in 2011. It's in its original widescreen OAR, and it was fantastic to finally have this movie. But DV-R is pretty disappointing and looks really compressed. It did actually get a proper, pressed DVD release in the UK from 101 Films in 2015. But apparently it's the same transfer and no extras or anything. Besides, now in 2022 we've got a proper blu-ray from Kino, and it's even a bit of a special edition. Everything else is now ancient history.
2011 MGM DVDR top; 2022 Kino BD bottom.

It's nice to see this isn't just the same master slapped onto an HD disc, although honestly, I would've been happy with that.  Especially since we're coming from a wonky, interlaced DV-R, not even a proper DVD.  But this is even better!  Obviously the compression is vastly improved, the image is sharper being in HD and the interlacing is corrected.  But beyond that, we have fresh, corrected colors so everything doesn't look so orange anymore, and the aspect ratio has been corrected from 1.82:1 to 1.85:1, slightly adjusting the framing of the entire picture.  Did I mention they made it less orange?  Because that really makes a big difference.

The original mono audio has been bumped up to DTS-HD, and optional English subtitles have been added to the blu.
And we finally get some extras.  We start out with an audio commentary by expert Lee Gambin, which is okay.  His expertise is clearly more on Henson than Potter, and he goes on a long 20+ minute jag of just reading every puppeteer's IMDB credits one by one.  But there's some good stuff in there, too, if you've got the patience.  The other main extra might take a little patience, too.  It's an audio-only interview by Gambin with director Peter Medak.  To be clear, Medak is a director, but not Dreamchild's.  He's here to share memories of star Coral Browne, who he worked with on another picture.  Unfortunately, he doesn't remember much more than the fact that she was sexy.  He's asked, for instance, if he ever saw Dreamchild, which Browne was immensely proud of; and Medak says he's pretty sure he did but doesn't remember it at all.  Like the commentary though, there are some interesting moments if you've got the time.  It's an unedited and slow phone call, including a long bit at the end where Gambin struggles to end the conversation... I can only imagine the reason they left all that in is because nobody listened to it before sticking it on the disc.  But it's still a nice, little bonus.  Kino also includes the theatrical trailer and a couple bonus trailers.  So this is easily a must-have for anyone's collection.
Now, maybe we can hope for an HD upgrade of Alice?  There are still a substantial number of excellent Potter teleplays left to be released on DVD, let alone blu, so maybe the BBC could give us a box boxed set.  Fingers crossed, but I'm not holding my breath.  So I strongly recommend the Kino blu and the 2 Entertain DVD, because more people should really see both... and Miller's adaptation too, for that matter.  But only viewers who are prepared for something a little heavier than a Disney musical.